Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 21;54(8):2277-91.
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/8/002. Epub 2009 Mar 20.

The risk of developing a second cancer after receiving craniospinal proton irradiation

Affiliations

The risk of developing a second cancer after receiving craniospinal proton irradiation

Wayne D Newhauser et al. Phys Med Biol. .

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to compare the risk of developing a second cancer after craniospinal irradiation using photon versus proton radiotherapy by means of simulation studies designed to account for the effects of neutron exposures. Craniospinal irradiation of a male phantom was calculated for passively-scattered and scanned-beam proton treatment units. Organ doses were estimated from treatment plans; for the proton treatments, the amount of stray radiation was calculated separately using the Monte Carlo method. The organ doses were converted to risk of cancer incidence using a standard formalism developed for radiation protection purposes. The total lifetime risk of second cancer due exclusively to stray radiation was 1.5% for the passively scattered treatment versus 0.8% for the scanned proton beam treatment. Taking into account the therapeutic and stray radiation fields, the risk of second cancer from intensity-modulated radiation therapy and conventional radiotherapy photon treatments were 7 and 12 times higher than the risk associated with scanned-beam proton therapy, respectively, and 6 and 11 times higher than with passively scattered proton therapy, respectively. Simulations revealed that both passively scattered and scanned-beam proton therapies confer significantly lower risks of second cancers than 6 MV conventional and intensity-modulated photon therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Monte Carlo simulation of particle fluences for the three craniospinal treatment fields. The upper plots represent the logarithm of the proton fluence, including primary protons and secondary protons generated via (n, xp) reactions in the treatment unit and in the phantom. The corresponding lower plots represent the logarithm of neutron fluence, including neutrons generated internally and externally to the phantom. Note that the fluence in each plot was scaled to maximize the visibility of the shape of the distributions, not their magnitude. (A), (B) Cranial field. (C), (D) Superior spinal field. (E), (F) Inferior spinal field. (This figure is in colour only in the electronic version)

References

    1. Agosteo S, Birattari C, Caravaggio M, Silari M, Tosi G. Secondary neutron and photon dose in proton therapy. Radiother. Oncol. 1998;48:293–305. - PubMed
    1. Billings MP, Yucker WR. Summary Final Report: The Computerized Anatomical Man (CAM) Huntington Beach, CA: McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company; 1973.
    1. Bues M, Newhauser WD, Titt U, Smith AR. Therapeutic step and shoot proton beam spot-scanning with a multi-leaf collimator: a Monte Carlo study. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2005;115:164–169. - PubMed
    1. Fontenot J, Newhauser W, Titt U. Design tools for proton therapy nozzles based on the double-scattering technique. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2005;116:211–215. - PubMed
    1. Fontenot J, Taddei P, Zheng Y, Mirkovic D, Jordan T, Newhauser W. Equivalent dose and effective dose from stray radiation during passively scattered proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008;53:1677–1688. - PubMed

Publication types