The current status of decompressive craniectomy

Abstract

Decompressive Craniectomy (DC) continues to be widely practiced but remains controversial. The procedure has its origins thousands of years ago, with early trepanation performed for a range of medical and religious reasons. We summarize the history, techniques, complications and pathophysiology and then explore in detail the recent evidence base for the most common indications for DC; Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Cerebral infarction. An important consideration from the outset is the often forgotten issue of cranioplasty and we summarize advances in materials, technology and discuss the optimum timing. Outcomes of ongoing randomized trials in TBI are awaited with interest but the trend in the nonrandomized literature suggests timely intervention reduces mortality with acceptable morbidity. Level 1 evidence for early DC in young patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction has arrived and has implications for neurosurgical practice and rehabilitation services. Current European and North American practice recommends the judicious use of DC in traumatic brain injury and malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in select patients.