Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 Apr;38(4):348-54.
doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1411-0.

[Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. 2-5-year results following two-stage reimplantation]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

[Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. 2-5-year results following two-stage reimplantation]

[Article in German]
M Pietsch et al. Orthopade. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The 2-5-year results for the treatment of deep infection of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after two-stage reimplantation are presented. An articulating temporary antibiotic spacer prosthesis (TASP) and a standardized antibiotic regimen were used.

Patients and methods: In a prospective study, 33 consecutive patients were treated with TASP. This articulating spacer was made on the table by cleaning and autoclaving removed parts of the TKA. Intravenous double antibiotic therapy in combination with rifampin was given for 10 days, followed by oral therapy for 4 weeks.

Results: At a mean follow-up period of 47 months (31-67), three patients had reinfection (success rate 91%). The average Hospital for Special Surgery knee score increased from 67 points (44-84) to 85 points (53-97) after reimplantation. Based on these results, 24 knees (73%) were rated excellent, five (15%) were rated good, three (9%) were rated fair, and one patient (3%) had a poor result. Complications included one case of temporary peroneal palsy, one dislocation of the spacer due to an insufficient extensor mechanism, and one fracture of the tibia due to substantial primary metaphyseal bone loss.

Conclusion: Using TASP, the disadvantages of joint fixation between the two stages could be reduced. There was no difference in the reinfection rate compared with procedures using fixed spacer blocks. TASP facilitates reimplantation and yields good functional results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Oct;19(7):874-9 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4 Suppl 1):50-5 - PubMed
    1. Orthopade. 2003 Jun;32(6):490-7 - PubMed
    1. Semin Arthroplasty. 1994 Jul;5(3):122-36 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jan;(430):125-31 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources