Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;3(1):59-62.
doi: 10.1007/s11832-008-0150-9. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

Digital imaging data on CD-R: a time trap for orthopaedic surgeons in outpatient clinics

Affiliations

Digital imaging data on CD-R: a time trap for orthopaedic surgeons in outpatient clinics

Stephanie Juenemann et al. J Child Orthop. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: X-rays are presented on CD-Rs in a digital format with increasing frequency. This technique is potentially more time-consuming for the clinician compared to conventional pictures.

Methods: Ten sets of six X-rays for each case were prepared in both the conventional way and in digital format on CD-R. The order was randomised. Time in seconds was measured for six experienced orthopaedic residents to present the most recent a.p. view out of a given set. As a precondition, the computer was turned on and the same viewing software was used for all digital sets. The results were compared using a non-linked Student's t-test (significance level P = 0.05).

Results: The presentation of conventional X-rays required 21 s (+/-7.5 s) and of digital X-rays 90 s (+/-27 s), respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In spite of ideal conditions, digital X-rays on CD-R need significantly more time in the orthopaedic clinic. In major centres, patients present with different software and software in other languages, which increase the required time even further. This latter problem will be assessed in another study. This increase of preparation time required by a highly qualified staff member has implications on the economics and logistics and has a negative impact on daily clinical practice. One of the solutions might be that the CD-Rs be given to the registration desk and the data being already prepared when the patient sees the doctor. This can also include it being implemented in the digital system used in the inpatient part of the hospital and, therefore, making any other consultations or second opinions easily accessible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ooijen PM, Roosjen R, de Blecourt MJ, et al. Evaluation of the use of CD-ROM upload into the PACS or institutional web server. J Digit Imaging. 2006;19(Suppl 1):72–77. doi: 10.1007/s10278-006-0932-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andriole KP. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. J Digit Imaging. 2002;15(3):161–169. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-0026-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment. J Digit Imaging. 2002;15(Suppl 1):124–126. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5079-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colin C, Vergnon P, Guibaud L, et al. Comparative assessment of digital and analog radiography: diagnostic accuracy, cost analysis and quality of care. Eur J Radiol. 1998;26(3):226–234. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(97)01168-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maass M, Kosonen M, Kormano M. Cost analysis of Turku University Central Hospital PACS in 1998. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2001;66(1):41–45. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00133-X. - DOI - PubMed