A comparison of two methods of measuring static coefficient of friction at low normal forces: a pilot study
- PMID: 19308825
- DOI: 10.1080/00140130802238622
A comparison of two methods of measuring static coefficient of friction at low normal forces: a pilot study
Abstract
This study compares two methods for estimating static friction coefficients for skin. In the first method, referred to as the 'tilt method', a hand supporting a flat object is tilted until the object slides. The friction coefficient is estimated as the tangent of the angle of the object at the slip. The second method estimates the friction coefficient as the pull force required to begin moving a flat object over the surface of the hand, divided by object weight. Both methods were used to estimate friction coefficients for 12 subjects and three materials (cardboard, aluminium, rubber) against a flat hand and against fingertips. No differences in static friction coefficients were found between the two methods, except for that of rubber, where friction coefficient was 11% greater for the tilt method. As with previous studies, the friction coefficients varied with contact force and contact area. Static friction coefficient data are needed for analysis and design of objects that are grasped or manipulated with the hand. The tilt method described in this study can easily be used by ergonomic practitioners to estimate static friction coefficients in the field in a timely manner.
Similar articles
-
Friction coefficients in a longitudinal direction between the finger pad and selected materials for different normal forces and curvatures.Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):609-16. doi: 10.1080/00140130802471595. Ergonomics. 2009. PMID: 19431002 Free PMC article.
-
Fingerprints are unlikely to increase the friction of primate fingerpads.J Exp Biol. 2009 Jul;212(Pt 13):2016-22. doi: 10.1242/jeb.028977. J Exp Biol. 2009. PMID: 19525427
-
Static friction properties between human palmar skin and five grabrail materials.Ergonomics. 2001 Sep 15;44(11):973-88. doi: 10.1080/00140130110074882. Ergonomics. 2001. PMID: 11693248
-
Minimal adhesion surface area in tangentially loaded digital contacts.J Biomech. 2011 Sep 2;44(13):2508-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Jul 19. J Biomech. 2011. PMID: 21774936 Review.
-
Research on the Friction Noise Generation Mechanism and Suppression Method of Submarine Rubber-Based Propeller Bearings-A Review.Polymers (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;15(16):3352. doi: 10.3390/polym15163352. Polymers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37631409 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Static prehension of a horizontally oriented object in three dimensions.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(2):249-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2923-5. Epub 2011 Nov 10. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22071684 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of handle orientation, gloves, handle friction and elbow posture on maximum horizontal pull and push forces.Ergonomics. 2010 Jan;53(1):92-101. doi: 10.1080/00140130903389035. Ergonomics. 2010. PMID: 20069485 Free PMC article.
-
Human Head and Helmet Interface Friction Coefficients with Biological Sex and Hair Property Comparisons.Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Oct;52(10):2717-2725. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03332-9. Epub 2023 Aug 4. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024. PMID: 37540293 Free PMC article.
-
Friction coefficients in a longitudinal direction between the finger pad and selected materials for different normal forces and curvatures.Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):609-16. doi: 10.1080/00140130802471595. Ergonomics. 2009. PMID: 19431002 Free PMC article.
-
A soft-contact model for computing safety margins in human prehension.Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Oct;55:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Hum Mov Sci. 2017. PMID: 28392098 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials