Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 Feb;13(1):51-6.
doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2008.0067.

Uptake, time course, and predictors of risk-reducing surgeries in BRCA carriers

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Uptake, time course, and predictors of risk-reducing surgeries in BRCA carriers

Mary S Beattie et al. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction and aims: For women who carry BRCA mutations, risk-reducing surgeries are an option to decrease breast and ovarian cancer risk. This study aims to determine the uptake, time course, and predictors of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA carriers.

Results: In 272 female carriers, followed for a median of 3.7 years, 23% of those eligible chose RRM, and 51% percent chose RRSO. Among BRCA carriers who chose these procedures, median time to both RRM and RRSO was approximately 4 months after learning of BRCA-positive results. Predictors of RRM were as follows: age below 60 years (hazard ratio 1.8, p=0.04), prior breast cancer (hazard ratio 2.4, p=0.0004), and RRSO (hazard ratio 7.2, p<0.0001). Predictors of RRSO were as follows: age below 60 years (hazard ratio 3.6, p=0.006), prior breast cancer (hazard ratio 1.8, p=0.002), and RRM (hazard ratio 5.4, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Many women who undergo BRCA testing use these results to make clinical decisions; those who choose risk-reducing surgeries typically do so within months of receiving BRCA-positive results. Predictors of risk-reducing surgery uptake include the following: age below 60 years, prior breast cancer, and utilization of another risk-reducing surgery. Future research directions include examining other preventive and screening options in BRCA carriers as well as studying motivations for choosing or declining risk-reducing surgeries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Uptake of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), stratified by age at BRCA testing (Kaplan–Meier). The x-axis represents the proportion of study subjects who uptake RRM. The y-axis represents time since BRCA-positive results disclosure. The four Kaplan–Meier curves in this figure represent RRM uptake in subjects of the following ages at BRCA testing: below 40, between 40 and 49, between 50 and 59, and 60 and above.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), stratified by age at BRCA testing (Kaplan–Meier). The x-axis represents the proportion of study subjects who uptake RRSO. The y-axis represents time since BRCA-positive results disclosure. The four Kaplan–Meier curves in this figure represent RRSO uptake in subjects of the following ages at BRCA testing: below 40, between 40 and 49, between 50 and 59, and 60 and above.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Uptake of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), stratified by prior history of breast cancer (Kaplan–Meier). The x-axis represents the proportion of study subjects who uptake RRM. The y-axis represents time since BRCA-positive results disclosure. The two Kaplan–Meier curves in this figure represent RRM uptake in study subjects with and without a prior history of breast cancer.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), stratified by prior history of breast cancer (Kaplan–Meier). The x-axis represents the proportion of study subjects who uptake RRSO. The y-axis represents time since BRCA-positive results disclosure. The two Kaplan–Meier curves represent RRSO uptake in study subjects with and without a prior history of breast cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson K. Jacobson JS. Heitjan DF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preventive strategies for women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:397–406. - PubMed
    1. Antoniou A. Pharoah PD. Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1117–1130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bermejo-Perez MJ. Marquez-Calderon S. Llanos-Mendez A. Effectiveness of preventive interventions in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers: a systematic review. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:225–231. - PubMed
    1. Botkin JR. Smith KR. Croyle RT, et al. Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. Am J Med Genet A. 2003;118:201–209. - PubMed
    1. Chen Y. Semenciw R. Kliewer E, et al. Incidence of second primary breast cancer among women with a first primary in Manitoba, Canada. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;67:35–40. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms