Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;22(3):447-56.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21209.

Effects of 10 Hz rTMS on the neural efficiency of working memory

Affiliations

Effects of 10 Hz rTMS on the neural efficiency of working memory

Gilbert Preston et al. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Working memory (WM) has been described as short-term retention of information that is no longer accessible in the environment, and the manipulation of this information for subsequent use in guiding behavior. WM is viewed as a cognitive process underlying higher-order cognitive functions. Evidence supports a critical role for PFC in mediating WM performance. Studies show psychomotor processing speed and accuracy account for considerable variance in neural efficiency (Ne). This study compared the relative effects of active and sham 10 Hz rTMS applied to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on indices of Ne in healthy participants performing a WM paradigm that models the association between WM load and task behavior [Sternberg, S. High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654, 1966]. Previous studies identified a relationship between diminished Ne and impaired WM across a broad array of clinical disorders. In the present study, the authors predicted there would be a main effect of stimulation group (STM) on accuracy (SCR) and processing speed (RT), hence, Ne. We observed a main effect of STM for RT without an effect on SCR; even so, there was a robust effect of STM on Ne.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative effects of active and sham 10 Hz rTMS on working memory reaction time. Left-side sequence: Pre-10 Hz rTMS RT*; Post-10 Hz rTMS RT; RT difference. Right-side sequence: RT difference; Pre-10 Hz rTMS RT*; Post-10 Hz rTMS RT. Compared with sham, the group treated with active 10 Hz rTMS applied to DLPFC 10 sec before onset experienced a 219-msec enhancement of RT.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lack of effect of 10 Hz rTMS on accuracy within or between subjects. The difference in accuracy within and between groups pre- and poststimulation was not significant.

References

    1. Abler B, Walter H, Wunderlich A, Grothe J, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Spitzer M, et al. Side effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation biased task performance in a cognitive neuroscience study. Brain Topography. 2005;17:193–196. - PubMed
    1. Aleman A, Sommer IE, Kahn RS. Efficacy of slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2007;68:416–421. - PubMed
    1. Altamura M, Elvevag B, Blasi G, Bertolino A, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR, et al. Dissociating the effects of Sternberg working memory demands in prefrontal cortex. Psychiatry Research. 2007;154:103–114. - PubMed
    1. Anderson EW, Preston GA, Silva CT. Towards development of a circuit based treatment for impaired memory: A multidisciplinary approach; Proceedings of the 3rd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.2007. pp. 302–305.
    1. Andreasen NC, Nopoulos P, O’Leary DS, Miller DD, Wassink T, Flaum M. Defining the phenotype of schizophrenia: Cognitive dysmetria and its neural mechanisms. Biological Psychiatry. 1999;46:908–920. - PubMed

Publication types