Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 May 6;196(4290):678-80.
doi: 10.1126/science.193185.

Pontine reticular formation neurons: relationship of discharge to motor activity

Pontine reticular formation neurons: relationship of discharge to motor activity

J M Siegel et al. Science. .

Abstract

The discharge correlates of pontine reticular formation units were investigated in unrestrained cats. In agreement with previous investigations using immobilized preparations, we found that these cells had high rates of activity in rapid eye movement sleep, and responded in waking to somatic, auditory, and vestibular stimuli at short latencies, many having polysensory responses and exhibiting rapid "habituation." However, despite the sensory responses of these cells, most unit activity could not be explained by the presence of sensory stimuli. Intense firing occurred in association with specific movements. Units deprived of their adequate somatic, vestibular, and auditory stimuli showed undiminished discharge rates during motor activity. Discrete sensory stimuli evoked sustained unit firing only when they also evoked a motor response. We conclude that activity in pontine reticular formation neurons is more closely related to motor output than to sensory input.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Relationship of PRF unit discharge to motor activity. (A) Polygraphic display of unit firing in unrestrained cat. Unit discharge is accompanied by phasic EMG activity. (Inset) High speed oscilloscopic tracing from same record (arrow) demonstrating the absence of artifact in the microwire recording. This unit had an average signal-to-noise ratio. (B) Unit responses to strong shock stimuli were brief, most discharge being time-locked to movements (augmented EMG) occurring during stimulation rather than to the shock stimulus itself. Dots indicate time of delivery of 1-msec shock stimulus to receptive field. (Inset) Brief response time-locked to shock in microwire recording of same unit. (C) Two units with different spontaneous activity levels simultaneously recorded during head restraint. Augmented unit discharge was correlated with muscle contraction. (D) During grooming, unit dischaiged rhythmically, with bursts time-locked to movements. Head motion created the slow rhythmic artifact in this broad-spectrum EMG recording. Grooming had been in progress for 20 minutes and continued for an additional 5 minutes. Abbreviations: EMG, electromyogram of dorsal neck muscles; Unit, the pulse output of a window discriminator. (A) and (D) are from the same cell. The 10-seconds marker applies to all four panels, exclusive of the two insets.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amassian VE and Devito RV, J. Neurophysiol. 17, 575 (1954); - PubMed
    2. Bradley WE and Conway CJ, Exp. Neurol. 16, 237 (1966); - PubMed
    3. Pompeiano O and Barnes CD, J. Neurophysiol.’ 34, 709 (1971); - PubMed
    4. Glickstein M, Stein J, King RA, Science 178, 1110 (1972); - PubMed
    5. Motokizawa F,Exp. Neurol. 44, 135 (1974); - PubMed
    6. Peterson BW, Filion M, Felpel LP, Abzug C, Exp. Brain Res. 22, 335 (1975);
    7. Nagano S, Myers JA, Hall RD,Exp. Neurol. 49, 653 (1974); - PubMed
    8. Hornby JB and Rose JD, ibid. 51,363 (1976). - PubMed
    1. Scheibel M, Scheibel A, Mollica A, Moruzzi G,j. Neurophysiol. 18, 309 (1955); - PubMed
    2. Bach-Y-Rita P, Exp. Neurol. 9, 327 (1964); - PubMed
    3. Scheibel ME and Scheibel AB, Arch. Ital. Biol. 103, 279 (1965); - PubMed
    4. Segundo JP, Takenaka T, Encabo H, J. Neurophysiol 30,1221 (1967); - PubMed
    5. Peterson BW, Franck JI, Pitts NG, Daunton NG,ibid. 39, 564 (1976). - PubMed
    1. Siegel JM and McGinty DJ, Science 193, 240 (1976). - PMC - PubMed
    1. The pontine gigantocellular tegmental field as defined by Berman AL in The Brain Stem of the Cat (Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1968) includes parts of the reticularis pontis oralis and caudalis nuclei described in earlier nomenclature.
    1. Responses of PRF units to noxious stimuli have been examined in acute and chronic studies including: Casey KL, Science 173, 77 (1971); - PubMed
    2. Barnes KL, Exp. Neurol. 50, 180 (1976); - PubMed
    3. Nyquist JK and Greenhoot JH, Brain Res. 70, 157 (1974); - PubMed
    4. Young DW and Gottschaldt KM, Exp. Neurol. 51,628 (1976); and - PubMed
    5. Sun CL and Gatipon GB, ibid. 52, 1 (1976). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources