The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons
- PMID: 19319025
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819565c1
The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons
Abstract
Plastic surgeons perform a wide range of surgical procedures that have diverse clinical goals and complex effects on patients' lives. In recent years, quality-of-life outcomes have become increasingly important to clinical practice and plastic surgery research. It is important, therefore, that plastic surgeons understand the scientific issues surrounding the appropriate development and use of questionnaires that measure quality of life; they may then directly shape how new measures are developed and used, and define the future of outcome measurement in plastic surgery.
Similar articles
-
How to use outcomes questionnaires: pearls and pitfalls.Clin Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;40(2):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 26. Clin Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 23506766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: use and interpretation in evidence-based medicine.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1361-1367. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182063276. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21088640 Review.
-
How to decide which patient-reported outcome measure to use? A practical guide for plastic surgeons.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Jul;71(7):957-966. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 28. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018. PMID: 29656898 Review.
-
A Review of Validated Quality-of-Life Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Plastic Surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov;142(5):694e-707e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004841. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 30113441 Review.
-
Outcomes instruments in facial plastic surgery.Facial Plast Surg. 2002 May;18(2):77-86. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32197. Facial Plast Surg. 2002. PMID: 12063654
Cited by
-
The "Five-flap" Technique for Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Nov 4;9(11):e3917. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003917. eCollection 2021 Nov. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021. PMID: 34745805 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Free-Flap Breast Reconstructive Surgery over Time (PRO-BREST).Breast Care (Basel). 2022 Jun;17(3):272-278. doi: 10.1159/000519804. Epub 2021 Dec 1. Breast Care (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35949418 Free PMC article.
-
International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome and experience measure for hand conditions (HAND-Q).BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e025822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025822. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30898824 Free PMC article.
-
Data-Driven Enhancements: Unleashing the Power of Data Science in Plastic Surgery.Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7):e42357. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42357. eCollection 2023 Jul. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37621827 Free PMC article.
-
Nano Fat Therapy and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Nano Fat Therapy Alone on Burn Scar.Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2025 Jun 30;38(2):119-123. eCollection 2025 Jun. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2025. PMID: 40589711 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Klassen A, Goodacre T. Methods of measuring health-related quality of life and outcome for plastic surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:251.
-
- Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL. Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: Current approaches and future directions. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:1.
-
- Bunker J. Operation rates, mortality statistics and the quality of life. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:1249.
-
- Spilker G, Stark GB. Quality of life considerations in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Theor Surg. 1991;143:6.
-
- Tomaino M. Surgical outcome: From the patient’s perspective or the surgeon’s? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:295.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical