Humanized large-scale expanded endothelial colony-forming cells function in vitro and in vivo
- PMID: 19321860
- PMCID: PMC2710924
- DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-181362
Humanized large-scale expanded endothelial colony-forming cells function in vitro and in vivo
Abstract
Endothelial progenitor cells are critically involved in essential biologic processes, such as vascular homeostasis, regeneration, and tumor angiogenesis. Endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) are endothelial progenitor cells with robust proliferative potential. Their profound vessel-forming capacity makes them a promising tool for innovative experimental, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies. Efficient and safe methods for their isolation and expansion are presently lacking. Based on the previously established efficacy of animal serum-free large-scale clinical-grade propagation of mesenchymal stromal cells, we hypothesized that endothelial lineage cells may also be propagated efficiently following a comparable strategy. Here we demonstrate that human ECFCs can be recovered directly from unmanipulated whole blood. A novel large-scale animal protein-free humanized expansion strategy preserves the progenitor hierarchy with sustained proliferation potential of more than 30 population doublings. By applying large-scale propagated ECFCs in various test systems, we observed vascular networks in vitro and perfused vessels in vivo. After large-scale expansion and cryopreservation phenotype, function, proliferation, and genomic stability were maintained. For the first time, proliferative, functional, and storable ECFCs propagated under humanized conditions can be explored in terms of their therapeutic applicability and risk profile.
Figures
) or immediately diluted (□) and seeded in EGM/10% pHPL in 75-cm2 cell culture flasks. Culture surfaces were coated (
) with collagen only when indicated (+). PB from patients with stable cardiovascular disease was also immediately diluted and seeded in EGM/10% pHPL (▨). (A) The initial appearance of visible colonies was determined by daily culture observation. (B) Colony number was counted at the end of the primary 7- to 19-day culture period. Results are shown as mean plus or minus SEM of 6 independent experiments. * indicates statistically significant difference, P < .05. (C-H) Representative early colonies (day 8) and parts of large expanded colonies (day 13) from healthy volunteers are depicted with 40× initial magnification corresponding to different recovery strategies as indicated. (A composite picture of 1 representative large ECFC colony is shown in Figure S1D.) Images were captured with a DS-Fi1 camera on a Nikon (Lijnden, Netherlands) Diaphot 300 inverted microscope (original magnification 4×/0.13 NA objective) with the NIS-Elements D3.0 image acquisition software (Nikon). (J) Population doublings (
) and expanded cell number (
) determined after large-scale expansion of ECFCs from 6 healthy volunteers (healthy controls) and 3 CVD patients are shown. (K) Cumulative population doublings (mean ± SD) as obtained during large-scale expansion of ECFCs from 6 healthy volunteers after large-scale expansion are shown. Large-scale expansion-derived cells bear a history of mean 21 population doublings before initiating long-term culture at cell seeding densities of 10 (◆), 100 (■), 1000 (▲), and 10 000 cells/cm2 (x). Cells were reseeded during long-term culture at indicated time points according to their initial seeding density.
) or 14 days (
). Colony plates were then fixed and stained before photo documentation. Precise cell numbers of all imaged colonies were counted in ImageJ software. (B) Examples of typical LPP and HPP colonies are depicted (Figure S2). Representative chromosome G-banding derived from ECFC nuclei after large-scale expansion of (C) female and (D) male ECFCs and corresponding sorted (E) female and (F) male karyograms are shown. Representative array CGH depiction of constitutional initial white blood cell–derived DNA compared with ECFC-derived DNA post large-scale expansion and after passage 4 of the same (G) female and (H) male volunteers as shown in panels C and E and D and F, respectively (further examples in Figure S4).
References
-
- Rafii S, Lyden D. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med. 2003;9:702–712. - PubMed
-
- Kovacic JC, Moore J, Herbert A, Ma D, Boehm M, Graham RM. Endothelial progenitor cells, angioblasts, and angiogenesis: old terms reconsidered from a current perspective. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2008;18:45–51. - PubMed
-
- Folkman J. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:15–18. - PubMed
-
- Khakoo AY, Finkel T. Endothelial progenitor cells. Annu Rev Med. 2005;56:79–101. - PubMed
-
- Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997;275:964–967. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
