Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;26(10):1815-22.
doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0867.

Alteration in functional brain systems after electrical injury

Affiliations

Alteration in functional brain systems after electrical injury

Alona Ramati et al. J Neurotrauma. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies in electrical injury patients have reported deficits in attention, learning, and working memory, but the neural substrates of these deficits remain poorly characterized. In this study we sought to examine whether electrical injury subjects demonstrate abnormal patterns of brain activation during working memory and procedural learning tasks. Fourteen electrical injury subjects and fifteen demographically matched healthy control subjects performed a spatial working memory paradigm and a procedural learning paradigm during functional MRI studies. For the spatial working memory task, electrical injury patients exhibited significantly greater activation in the middle frontal gyrus and motor and posterior cingulate cortices. Increased activation in EI subjects also was observed on a visually-guided saccade task in several sensorimotor regions, including the frontal and parietal eye fields and striatum. On the procedural learning task, electrical injury patients exhibited significantly less activation in the middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and frontal eye fields than controls. This is the first study to document task-dependent, system-level cortical and subcortical dysfunction in individuals who had experienced an electrical shock trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Group comparison (t test) maps, thresholded as described in the methods section, during the procedural learning (left, Z = 52) and spatial working memory (right, Z = 34) tasks, overlaid on the overall group average anatomical image. On the procedural learning task, healthy controls displayed greater activation in the frontal eye fields (FEF), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), motor and posterior cingulate cortices (CING), and in the intraparietal sulcal (IPS) region. On the spatial working memory task, greater activation among the EI subjects was seen in the FEF, MFG, IPS, and precuneus (PREC) region.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beck A. Steer R. Brown G. Beck Depression Inventory–II. The Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX: 1987.
    1. Conner C.K. Manual for the Conner's Continuous Performance Test–II. Multi health Systems; Tanawanda, NY: 2002.
    1. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998;95:831–838. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox R.W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996;29:162–173. - PubMed
    1. Delis D.C. Kramer J.H. Kaplan E. Ober B.A. California Verbal Learning Test, Second Adult Version Manual. The Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX: 2000.

MeSH terms