Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 26:9:7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-7.

Delivery of chlamydia screening to young women requesting emergency hormonal contraception at pharmacies in Manchester, UK: a prospective study

Affiliations

Delivery of chlamydia screening to young women requesting emergency hormonal contraception at pharmacies in Manchester, UK: a prospective study

Loretta Brabin et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: More women are requesting Emergency Hormonal Contraception (EHC) at pharmacies where screening for Chlamydia trachomatis is not routinely offered. The objective of this study was to assess the uptake of free postal chlamydia screening by women under 25 years who requested EHC at pharmacies in Manchester, UK.

Methods: Six Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) that had contracted with pharmacies to provide free EHC, requested the largest EHC providers (> or = 40 doses annually) to also offer these clients a coded chlamydia home testing kit. Pharmacies kept records of the ages and numbers of women who accepted or refused chlamydia kits. Women sent urine samples directly to the laboratory for testing and positive cases were notified. Audit data on EHC coverage was obtained from PCTs to assess the proportion of clients eligible for screening and to verify the uptake rate.

Results: 33 pharmacies participated. Audit data for 131 pharmacy months indicated that only 24.8% (675/2718) of women provided EHC were also offered chlamydia screening. Based on tracking forms provided by pharmacies for the whole of the study, 1348/2904 EHC clients (46.4%) who had been offered screening accepted a screening kit. 264 (17.6%) of those who accepted a kit returned a sample, of whom 24 (9.1%) were chlamydia-positive. There was an increase in chlamydia positivity with age (OR: 1.2 per year; 1.04 to 1.44; p = 0.015).

Conclusion: Chlamydia screening for EHC pharmacy clients is warranted but failure of pharmacists to target all EHC clients represented a missed opportunity for treating a well defined high-risk group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Chlamydia Screening Programme . Maintaining Momentum: Annual Report of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England 2006/7. Health Protection Agency, London; 2007.
    1. Adams EJ, Charlett A, Edmunds WJ, Hughes G. Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies. Sex Trans Inf. 2004;80:354–362. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.005454. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner KME, Adams EJ, La Montagne DS, Emmett L, Baster K, Edmunds WJ. Modelling the effectiveness of chlamydia screening in England. Sex Trans Inf. 2006;82:496–502. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.019067. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pimenta M, Catchpole M, Rogers PA, Perkins E, Jackson N, Carlisle C, Randall S, Hopwood J, Hewitt G, Underhill G, Mallinson H, McLean L, Gleave T, Tobin J, Harinda V, Ghosh A. Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydia infection I: Acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings. Sex Trans Inf. 2003;79:16–21. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health Monitoring the uptake of chlamydia screening – vital signs indicators 2008/09 London. 2008. http://www.chlamydiascreening.nhs.uk/ps/assets/pdfs/data/VSI_AlanHall_Ga...

Publication types

MeSH terms