Delivery of chlamydia screening to young women requesting emergency hormonal contraception at pharmacies in Manchester, UK: a prospective study
- PMID: 19323804
- PMCID: PMC2667404
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-7
Delivery of chlamydia screening to young women requesting emergency hormonal contraception at pharmacies in Manchester, UK: a prospective study
Abstract
Background: More women are requesting Emergency Hormonal Contraception (EHC) at pharmacies where screening for Chlamydia trachomatis is not routinely offered. The objective of this study was to assess the uptake of free postal chlamydia screening by women under 25 years who requested EHC at pharmacies in Manchester, UK.
Methods: Six Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) that had contracted with pharmacies to provide free EHC, requested the largest EHC providers (> or = 40 doses annually) to also offer these clients a coded chlamydia home testing kit. Pharmacies kept records of the ages and numbers of women who accepted or refused chlamydia kits. Women sent urine samples directly to the laboratory for testing and positive cases were notified. Audit data on EHC coverage was obtained from PCTs to assess the proportion of clients eligible for screening and to verify the uptake rate.
Results: 33 pharmacies participated. Audit data for 131 pharmacy months indicated that only 24.8% (675/2718) of women provided EHC were also offered chlamydia screening. Based on tracking forms provided by pharmacies for the whole of the study, 1348/2904 EHC clients (46.4%) who had been offered screening accepted a screening kit. 264 (17.6%) of those who accepted a kit returned a sample, of whom 24 (9.1%) were chlamydia-positive. There was an increase in chlamydia positivity with age (OR: 1.2 per year; 1.04 to 1.44; p = 0.015).
Conclusion: Chlamydia screening for EHC pharmacy clients is warranted but failure of pharmacists to target all EHC clients represented a missed opportunity for treating a well defined high-risk group.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative study of pharmacists' views on offering chlamydia screening to women requesting Emergency Hormonal Contraception.BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):109-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02362.x. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 19775305
-
Chlamydia testing in community pharmacies: evaluation of a feasibility pilot in south east London.Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):303-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020883. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007. PMID: 17693680 Free PMC article.
-
The feasibility and acceptability of the provision of alcohol screening and brief advice in pharmacies for women accessing emergency contraception: an evaluation study.BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 5;14:1139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1139. BMC Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25369791 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. doi: 10.3310/hta11080. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17311735 Review.
-
Emergency hormonal contraceptive service provision via community pharmacies in the UK: a systematic review of pharmacists' and young women's views, perspectives and experiences.Perspect Public Health. 2020 Mar;140(2):108-116. doi: 10.1177/1757913919867356. Epub 2019 Aug 12. Perspect Public Health. 2020. PMID: 31402746
Cited by
-
To develop and measure the effectiveness and acceptability of a pharmacy-based chlamydia screening intervention in Australia.BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 17;3(8):e003338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003338. BMJ Open. 2013. PMID: 23955190 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual and reproductive health services provided by community pharmacists: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 26;11(7):e047034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047034. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34312200 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacist-led screening in sexually transmitted infections: current perspectives.Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2018 Jun 15;7:67-82. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S140426. eCollection 2018. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2018. PMID: 29942790 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring pharmacy and home-based sexually transmissible infection testing.Sex Health. 2015 Nov;12(6):472-9. doi: 10.1071/SH15031. Sex Health. 2015. PMID: 26409484 Free PMC article.
-
Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 Feb;9(2):183-94. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.164. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011. PMID: 21342066 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- National Chlamydia Screening Programme . Maintaining Momentum: Annual Report of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England 2006/7. Health Protection Agency, London; 2007.
-
- Pimenta M, Catchpole M, Rogers PA, Perkins E, Jackson N, Carlisle C, Randall S, Hopwood J, Hewitt G, Underhill G, Mallinson H, McLean L, Gleave T, Tobin J, Harinda V, Ghosh A. Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydia infection I: Acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings. Sex Trans Inf. 2003;79:16–21. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Department of Health Monitoring the uptake of chlamydia screening – vital signs indicators 2008/09 London. 2008. http://www.chlamydiascreening.nhs.uk/ps/assets/pdfs/data/VSI_AlanHall_Ga...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical