Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 Jul;23(5):460-70.
doi: 10.1177/0269216309103664. Epub 2009 Mar 26.

Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatment intensity

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatment intensity

M R Larochelle et al. Palliat Med. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Discrepancies between patient wishes and end-of-life treatment decisions have been documented, and the determinants of end-of-life treatment decisions are not well understood. Our objective was to understand hospital staff perceptions of the role of acute care hospital medical doctors in end-of-life treatment intensity. In 11 purposively sampled Pennsylvania hospitals, we completed 108 audiotaped semistructured interviews with key informants involved in decision making or discharge planning. Using grounded theory, we qualitatively analysed transcripts using constant comparison to identify factors affecting end-of-life treatment decisions. A predominant theme identified was that end-of-life treatment intensity depends on the doctor. Communication with patients and families and collaboration with other care team members also were reported to vary, contributing to treatment variation. Informants attributed physician variation to individual beliefs and attitudes regarding the end-of-life (religion and culture, determination of when a patient is dying, quality-of-life determination and fear of failing) and to socialization by and interaction with the healthcare system (training, role perception, experience and response to incentives). When end-of-life treatment depends on the doctor, patient and family preferences may be neglected. Targeted interventions may reduce variability and align end-of-life treatment with patient wishes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure. Conceptual “depends on the doctor” model
The central behavior identified by informants as varying by physicians was treatment intensity at end-of-life. Two other behaviors, communication with patients/families and collaboration with care team members, were also found to vary by physician, and are directly associated with treatment intensity. Informants attributed physician variability to beliefs and attitudes and socialization by and interaction with the health care system.

References

    1. Pritchard RS, Fisher ES, Teno JM, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Risks and Outcomes of Treatment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1998;46(10):1242–50. [see comments] - PubMed
    1. SUPPORT_Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT) JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591–8. - PubMed
    1. Alpert HR, Emanuel L. Comparing utilization of life-sustaining treatments with patient and public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(3):175–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, Coppola K, Dawson NV. Medical care inconsistent with patients’ treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(3):496–500. - PubMed
    1. Hardin SB, Yusufaly YA. Difficult end-of-life treatment decisions: do other factors trump advance directives? Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(14):1531–3. - PubMed

Publication types