Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Mar;88(3):276-9.
doi: 10.1177/0022034508330884.

Does fluoride in compomers prevent future caries in children?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Does fluoride in compomers prevent future caries in children?

F Trachtenberg et al. J Dent Res. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Compomer restorations release fluoride to help prevent future caries. We tested the hypothesis that compomer is associated with fewer future caries compared with amalgam. The five-year New England Children's Amalgam Trial recruited 534 children aged 6-10 yrs with >or= 2 carious posterior teeth. Children were randomized to receive compomer or amalgam restorations in primary posterior teeth, placed with a fluoride-releasing bonding agent. The association between restorative material and future caries was assessed by survival analysis. Average follow-up of restorations (N = 1085 compomer, 954 amalgams) was 2.8 + 1.4 yrs in 441 children. No significant difference between materials was found in the rate of new caries on different surfaces of the same tooth. Incident caries on other teeth appeared slightly more quickly after placement of compomer restorations (p = 0.007), but the difference was negligible after 5 yrs. Under the conditions of this trial, we found no preventive benefit to fluoride-releasing compomer compared with amalgam.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00065988.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Rates of new caries after restoration placement, by treatment group, in the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial (N = 2039 restorations). (a) Rate of new caries on a different surface of the same tooth. P = 0.98, calculated from a random-effects accelerated-failure time model with proportional hazards, adjusted for gender, socio-economic status, and number of decayed and filled surfaces in the mouth. (b) Rate of new caries on a different tooth. P = 0.007, calculated from a random-effects accelerated-failure time model with proportional hazards, adjusted for age.

Comment in

Similar articles

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2005). Guideline on periodicity of examination, preventive dental services, anticipatory guidance, and oral treatment for children. Pediatr Dent 27(7 Suppl):84S-86S - PubMed
    1. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. (2002). Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 60:93-97 - PubMed
    1. Attar N, Onen A. (2002). Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26:289-296 - PubMed
    1. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, et al. (2006). Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 295:1775-1783 - PubMed
    1. Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM. (2002). Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 24:465-479 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data