Does fluoride in compomers prevent future caries in children?
- PMID: 19329464
- PMCID: PMC2762208
- DOI: 10.1177/0022034508330884
Does fluoride in compomers prevent future caries in children?
Abstract
Compomer restorations release fluoride to help prevent future caries. We tested the hypothesis that compomer is associated with fewer future caries compared with amalgam. The five-year New England Children's Amalgam Trial recruited 534 children aged 6-10 yrs with >or= 2 carious posterior teeth. Children were randomized to receive compomer or amalgam restorations in primary posterior teeth, placed with a fluoride-releasing bonding agent. The association between restorative material and future caries was assessed by survival analysis. Average follow-up of restorations (N = 1085 compomer, 954 amalgams) was 2.8 + 1.4 yrs in 441 children. No significant difference between materials was found in the rate of new caries on different surfaces of the same tooth. Incident caries on other teeth appeared slightly more quickly after placement of compomer restorations (p = 0.007), but the difference was negligible after 5 yrs. Under the conditions of this trial, we found no preventive benefit to fluoride-releasing compomer compared with amalgam.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00065988.
Figures

Comment in
-
Restorative treatment of primary teeth using compomer is not more effective than treatment with amalgam in preventing new tooth decay in children.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011 Mar;11(1):41-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2010.11.020. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011. PMID: 21420011 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jun;138(6):763-72. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0264. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17545265 Clinical Trial.
-
Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.Am J Dent. 2002 Dec;15(6):361-4. Am J Dent. 2002. PMID: 12691270
-
Fluorides leaching from restorative materials and the effect on adjacent teeth.Int Dent J. 2010 Jun;60(3):156-60. Int Dent J. 2010. PMID: 20684440 Clinical Trial.
-
Fluoride-containing restorative materials.Int Dent J. 2006 Feb;56(1):33-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2006.tb00072.x. Int Dent J. 2006. PMID: 16515011 Review.
-
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11(11):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33142363 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2005). Guideline on periodicity of examination, preventive dental services, anticipatory guidance, and oral treatment for children. Pediatr Dent 27(7 Suppl):84S-86S - PubMed
-
- Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. (2002). Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 60:93-97 - PubMed
-
- Attar N, Onen A. (2002). Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26:289-296 - PubMed
-
- Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, et al. (2006). Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 295:1775-1783 - PubMed
-
- Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM. (2002). Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 24:465-479 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical