Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Oct 5;303(6806):813-5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6806.813.

Radiographic examination of the lumbar spine in a community hospital: an audit of current practice

Affiliations

Radiographic examination of the lumbar spine in a community hospital: an audit of current practice

S F Halpin et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess general practitioners' decisions to request lumbar spine radiographs according to the guidelines of the Royal College of Radiologists.

Design: Prospective questionnaire survey of outpatients attending for lumbar spine radiography.

Setting: London community hospital.

Subjects: 100 consecutive adult outpatients attending for lumbar spine radiography at their general practitioner's request.

Main outcome measures: Patient's history and clinical signs; radiological diagnosis; change in management of patients with significant radiological abnormality in response to the radiologist's report.

Results: 60 patients were aged between 18 and 45, 27 (45%) of whom were women. Five patients were fully examined by their doctor before radiographs were requested, 76 were partially examined, and 19 were not examined. In 37 patients the examinations showed radiologically normal findings; 30 had radiologically significant disc or degenerative disease. Pain score and radiological diagnosis was not correlated (6.43 (range 1-10) for patients with significant disease v 6.14 (range 1-10) for those without, p greater than 0.05). There were no cases of malignancy or infection. One patient with radiologically significant disease was referred to a hospital specialist, and the management of only two such patients was altered by the report. 52 of the examinations should not have been requested if the guidelines had been strictly applied.

Conclusions: There is a need to inform doctors of the efficacy of radiological examinations. An awareness of the college's guidelines among general practitioners should be actively promoted by radiologists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Clin Radiol. 1967 Apr;18(2):158-62 - PubMed
    1. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1979 May;8(4):261-87 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1981 Oct 10;2(8250):791-5 - PubMed
    1. Br J Hosp Med. 1982 Sep;28(3):187, 190-1, 193-4, passim - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1984 Oct 6;2(8406):795-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources