Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009;64(3):177-82.
doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000300005.

Locoregional anesthesia for dental treatment in cardiac patients: a comparative study of 2% plain lidocaine and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Locoregional anesthesia for dental treatment in cardiac patients: a comparative study of 2% plain lidocaine and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000)

Alessandra Batistela Laragnoit et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009.

Abstract

Objectives: This study analyzes hemodynamic changes in patients with cardiac valvular diseases submitted to dental treatment under local anesthesia containing epinephrine.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed at the Dental Division of the Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (Brazil). Patients were separated into two groups with the help of an aleatory number table: 2% plain lidocaine (PL, n= 31) and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) (LE, n= 28). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygenation and electrocardiogram data were all recorded throughout the procedure. State and trait anxiety levels were measured.

Results: Fifty-nine patients were selected for the LE group (n=28), with an average age of 40.3 +/- 10.9, or for the PL group (n=31), age 42.2 +/- 10.3. No differences were shown in blood pressure, heart rate and pulse oximetry values before, during and after local anesthesia injection between the two groups. State and trait anxiety levels were not different. Arrhythmias observed before dental anesthesia did not change in shape or magnitude after treatment. Complaints of pain during the dental procedure were more frequent within the PL group, which received a higher amount of local anesthesia.

Conclusion: Lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) provided effective local anesthesia. This treatment did not cause an increase in heart rate or blood pressure and did not cause any arrhythmic changes in patients with cardiac valvular diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean arterial pressure for PL (mean − SD) and LE groups (mean + SD) throughout the procedure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matsuura H. Analysis of systemic complications and deaths during dental treatment in Japan. Anesth Prog. 1989;36:223–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant DA, Lie T, Clark SM, Adams DF. Pain and discomfort levels in patients during root surface debridement with sonic metal or plastic inserts. J Periodontol. 1993;64:645–50. - PubMed
    1. Brand HS, Gortzak RA, Palmer-Bouva CC, Abraham RE, Abraham-Inpjin L. Cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses during acute stress induced by different types of dental treatment. Int Dent J. 1995;45:45–8. - PubMed
    1. Brand HS, Abraham-Inpijn L. Cardiovascular responses induced by dental treatment. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104:245–52. - PubMed
    1. Cioffi GA, Chernow B, Glahn RP, Terezhalmy GT, Lake CR. The hemodynamic and plasma catecholamine responses to routine restorative dental care. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;11:67–70. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms