Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a health economics analysis
- PMID: 19330495
- DOI: 10.1007/s12325-009-0013-x
Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a health economics analysis
Erratum in
- Adv Ther. 2009 Jul;26(7):737
Abstract
Introduction: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a novel antidepressant therapy shown to be effective and safe in pharmacotherapy-resistant major depression. The incremental cost-effectiveness and the direct cost burden compared with sham treatment were estimated, and compared with the current standard of care.
Methods: Healthcare resource utilization data were collected during a multicenter study (n=301) and a decision analysis was used to stratify the 9-week treatment outcomes. A Markov model with an acute-outcome severity-based risk of relapse was used to estimate the illness course over a full year of treatment follow-up. These model estimates were also compared to best estimates of outcomes and costs of pharmacotherapy treatment, using the published STAR(*)D outcomes. The cost-effectiveness of TMS was described using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and on a direct cost per patient basis across a varying range of assumptions. The model's sensitivities to costs due to losses in work productivity and to caregiver time were also examined.
Results: Compared with sham treatment and at a cost of US$300 per treatment session, TMS provides an ICER of US$34,999 per QALY, which is less than the "willingness-to-pay' standard of US$50,000 per QALY for a new treatment for major depression. When productivity gains due to clinical recovery were included, the ICER was reduced to US$6667 per QALY. In open-label conditions, TMS provided a net cost saving of US$1123 per QALY when compared with the current standard of care. In the openlabel condition, cost savings increased further when the costs for productivity losses were included in the model (net savings of US$7621). The overall cost benefits of treating MD using TMS were greater in those patients at the earliest levels of treatment resistance in the overall sample.
Conclusion: TMS is a cost-effective treatment for patients who have failed to receive sufficient benefit from initial antidepressant pharmacotherapy. When used at earlier levels of treatment resistance, significant cost savings may be expected relative to the current standard of care.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00104611.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy versus antidepressant therapy for management of depression in Japan.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;43(6):539-47. doi: 10.1080/00048670902873664. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19440886 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation vs. electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.J Affect Disord. 2008 Aug;109(3):273-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Feb 11. J Affect Disord. 2008. PMID: 18262655 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of group psychotherapy for depression in Uganda.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Sep;11(3):127-33. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008. PMID: 18806302
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Antidepressant Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.04.004. Value Health. 2015. PMID: 26297087
-
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Economic Analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 1;16(6):1-51. eCollection 2016. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016. PMID: 27110317 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for People With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 May 6;21(4):1-232. eCollection 2021. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021. PMID: 34055112 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depression.Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Jun 26;11:1549-60. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S67477. eCollection 2015. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015. PMID: 26170668 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic literature review of the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in non-treatment resistant patients with major depressive disorder.BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1989-z. BMC Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30621636 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-utility analysis of curative and maintenance repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Trials. 2020 Apr 5;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04255-9. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32248820 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus Recommendations for the Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression.J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1):16cs10905. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16cs10905. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 28541649 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical