Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures
- PMID: 19330888
- PMCID: PMC4118744
- DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818d775c
Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures
Abstract
Background: Intensification of pharmacotherapy in persons with poorly controlled chronic conditions has been proposed as a clinically meaningful process measure of quality.
Objective: To validate measures of treatment intensification by evaluating their associations with subsequent control in hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus across 35 medical facility populations in Kaiser Permanente, Northern California.
Design: Hierarchical analyses of associations of improvements in facility-level treatment intensification rates from 2001 to 2003 with patient-level risk factor levels at the end of 2003.
Patients: Members (515,072 and 626,130; age >20 years) with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and/or diabetes mellitus in 2001 and 2003, respectively.
Measurements: Treatment intensification for each risk factor defined as an increase in number of drug classes prescribed, of dosage for at least 1 drug, or switching to a drug from another class within 3 months of observed poor risk factor control.
Results: Facility-level improvements in treatment intensification rates between 2001 and 2003 were strongly associated with greater likelihood of being in control at the end of 2003 (P < or = 0.05 for each risk factor) after adjustment for patient- and facility-level covariates. Compared with facility rankings based solely on control, addition of percentages of poorly controlled patients who received treatment intensification changed 2003 rankings substantially: 14%, 51%, and 29% of the facilities changed ranks by 5 or more positions for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, respectively.
Conclusions: Treatment intensification is tightly linked to improved control. Thus, it deserves consideration as a process measure for motivating quality improvement and possibly for measuring clinical performance.
Comment in
-
Improving the quality of quality measurement: the tinkerer, the tailor and the candlestick maker.Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):375-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a14b65. Med Care. 2009. PMID: 19279509 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, et al. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991;83(1):356–362. - PubMed
-
- Poulter N. Coronary heart disease is a multi-factorial disease. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12(10 Pt 2):92S–95S. - PubMed
-
- Vaccaro O, Stamler J, Neaton JD. Sixteen-year coronary mortality in black and white men with diabetes screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27:636–641. - PubMed
-
- Greenland P, Knoll MD, Stamler J, et al. Major risk factors as antecedents of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2003;290:891–7. - PubMed
-
- Khot UB, Khot MB, Bajzer CT, et al. Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2003;290:898–904. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical