Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2009 Apr;17(2):113-21.
doi: 10.1037/a0015418.

Increased sensitivity to the disinhibiting effects of alcohol in adults with ADHD

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Increased sensitivity to the disinhibiting effects of alcohol in adults with ADHD

Jessica Weafer et al. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

The acute impairing effects of alcohol on inhibitory control have been well documented in healthy drinkers. By contrast, little is known about alcohol effects in individuals with disorders characterized by poor impulse control, such as those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Alcohol could produce greater inhibitory impairment in these individuals. The present study tested this hypothesis in adults with ADHD (n=10) and controls (n=12) using the cued go/no-go task. The task requires quick responses to go targets and suppression of responses to no-go targets following the presentation of cues. Prior research on healthy adults has shown that valid cues can protect against alcohol impairment (Marczinski & Fillmore, 2003). Performance was tested under 3 doses of alcohol: 0.65 g/kg, 0.45 g/kg, and 0.0 g/kg (placebo). Alcohol dose-dependently increased inhibitory failures in controls in the invalid, but not the valid, cue condition. By contrast, those with ADHD displayed significant alcohol impairment regardless of cue condition. Thus, unlike controls, valid cues offered little protection from the disinhibiting effects of alcohol in drinkers with ADHD, suggesting an increased sensitivity to alcohol impairment of inhibitory control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean proportion of failures to inhibit responses to no-go targets after go and no-go cues for the control and ADHD groups under three alcohol doses: 0.0 g/kg (placebo), 0.45 g/kg, and 0.65 g/kg. Capped vertical lines show standard errors of the mean.

References

    1. Adler LA, Sutton VK, Moore RJ, Dietrich AP, Reimherr FW, Sangal RB, et al. Quality of life assessment in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with atomoxetine. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2006;26:648–652. - PubMed
    1. Alderson RM, Rapport MD, Kofler MJ. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral inhibition: A meta-analytic review of the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2007;35:745–758. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Author; Washington, DC: 1994.
    1. Barkley RA. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In: Wolfe DA, Mash EJ, editors. Behavioral and emotional disorders in adolescents: Nature, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Publications; New York, NY: 2006. pp. 91–152.
    1. Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121:65–94. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms