Combination therapies for traumatic brain injury: prospective considerations
- PMID: 19331514
- PMCID: PMC2857809
- DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0794
Combination therapies for traumatic brain injury: prospective considerations
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) initiates a cascade of numerous pathophysiological events that evolve over time.Despite the complexity of TBI, research aimed at therapy development has almost exclusively focused on single therapies, all of which have failed in multicenter clinical trials. Therefore, in February 2008 the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, with support from the National Institute of Child Health and Development, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, convened a workshop to discuss the opportunities and challenges of testing combination therapies for TBI. Workshop participants included clinicians and scientists from a variety of disciplines, institutions, and agencies. The objectives of the workshop were to: (1) identify the most promising combinations of therapies for TBI; (2) identify challenges of testing combination therapies in clinical and pre-clinical studies; and (3) propose research methodologies and study designs to overcome these challenges. Several promising combination therapies were discussed, but no one combination was identified as being the most promising. Rather, the general recommendation was to combine agents with complementary targets and effects (e.g., mechanisms and time-points), rather than focusing on a single target with multiple agents. In addition, it was recommended that clinical management guidelines be carefully considered when designing pre-clinical studies for therapeutic development.To overcome the challenges of testing combination therapies it was recommended that statisticians and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration be included in early discussions of experimental design. Furthermore, it was agreed that an efficient and validated screening platform for candidate therapeutics, sensitive and clinically relevant biomarkers and outcome measures, and standardization and data sharing across centers would greatly facilitate the development of successful combination therapies for TBI. Overall there was great enthusiasm for working collaboratively to act on these recommendations.
References
-
- Adams J.H. Graham D.I. Gennarelli T.A. Head injury in man and experimental animals: neuropathology. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. (Wien.) 1983;32:15–30. - PubMed
-
- Adams J.H. Graham D.I. Murray L.S. Scott G. Diffuse axonal injury due to nonmissile head injury in humans: an analysis of 45 cases. Ann. Neurol, 1982;12:557–563. - PubMed
-
- Adibhatla R.M. Hatcher J.F. Citicoline mechanisms and clinical efficacy in cerebral ischemia. J. Neurosci. Res. 2002;70:133–139. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed S.M. Rzigalinski B.A. Willoughby K.A. Sitterding H.A. Ellis E.F. Stretch-induced injury alters mitochondrial membrane potential and cellular ATP in cultured astrocytes and neurons. J. Neurochem. 2000;74:1951–1960. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources