Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Apr;6(2):258-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.014.

Commentary: physical approaches for the treatment of epilepsy: electrical and magnetic stimulation and cooling

Affiliations
Review

Commentary: physical approaches for the treatment of epilepsy: electrical and magnetic stimulation and cooling

Wolfgang Löscher et al. Neurotherapeutics. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Physical approaches for the treatment of epilepsy currently under study or development include electrical or magnetic brain stimulators and cooling devices, each of which may be implanted or applied externally. Some devices may stimulate peripheral structures, whereas others may be implanted directly into the brain. Stimulation may be delivered chronically, intermittently, or in response to either manual activation or computer-based detection of events of interest. Physical approaches may therefore ultimately be appropriate for seizure prophylaxis by causing a modification of the underlying substrate, presumably with a reduction in the intrinsic excitability of cerebral structures, or for seizure termination, by interfering with the spontaneous discharge of pathological neuronal networks. Clinical trials of device-based therapies are difficult due to ethical issues surrounding device implantation, problems with blinding, potential carryover effects that may occur in crossover designs if substrate modification occurs, and subject heterogeneity. Unresolved issues in the development of physical treatments include optimization of stimulation parameters, identification of the optimal volume of brain to be stimulated, development of adequate power supplies to stimulate the necessary areas, and a determination that stimulation itself does not promote epileptogenesis or adverse long-term effects on normal brain function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Theodore WH, Fisher RS. Brain stimulation for epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:111–118. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00664-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Theodore WH, Fisher R. Brain stimulation for epilepsy. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97:261–272. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_29. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groves DA, Brown VJ. Vagal nerve stimulation: a review of its applications and potential mechanisms that mediate its clinical effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29:493–500. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boon P, De H V, Vonck K, Van Roost D. Clinical experience with vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation in epilepsy. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97:273–280. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_30. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milby AH, Halpem CH, Baituch GH. Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy and depression. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.10.071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms