Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse
- PMID: 19335154
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0290
Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse
Abstract
Background and purpose: Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RALS) is a new surgical management option for pelvic organ prolapse that secures the apex of the vagina to the sacral promontory. Limited literature exists on outcomes of this procedure. We present our initial experience with RALS.
Patients and methods: Women with vaginal vault prolapse and significant apical defects as defined by a Baden-Walker score of 3 or greater were offered RALS without any other procedure. Chart review was performed to analyze operative and perioperative data, including urodynamics (UDS) and Baden-Walker classification before and after surgery. Data were analyzed with comparison of presurgical and postsurgical data.
Results: From July 2005 through July 2007, 21 patients underwent RALS. Blood loss was negligible. Average operative time, including robot docking, was 3 hours, 14 minutes. Nineteen patients were discharged on postoperative day 1. UDS were not changed significantly. One patient had an apical recurrence. There were no operative complications or conversions; however, one patient had a small bowel obstruction 5 days after surgery necessitating laparotomy. Of the 21 patients, 12 have undergone anterior and posterior repair, 5 await repair, and 4 patients have opted for conservative management.
Conclusions: RALS is effective to repair apical vaginal defects in patients with significant pelvic organ prolapse. Operative time is manageable and complications are few. Cystocele, rectocele, and UDS remain essentially unchanged by RALS. Most, if not all, patients with cystocele and rectocele will need further vaginal reconstruction after RALS, if desired. Greater follow-up and numbers are needed to further establish the role of this procedure.
Similar articles
-
Supracervical robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):525-30. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466008006. JSLS. 2010. PMID: 21605516 Free PMC article.
-
Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse.Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4A Suppl):52S-56S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.022. Am J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15476652
-
Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.040. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16813916
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
-
Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse.Tech Urol. 2001 Jun;7(2):139-45. Tech Urol. 2001. PMID: 11383992 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Feb;22(2):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1265-3. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Int Urogynecol J. 2011. PMID: 20842494 Free PMC article.
-
Supracervical robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):525-30. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466008006. JSLS. 2010. PMID: 21605516 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):455-460. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0757-2. Epub 2017 Oct 4. J Robot Surg. 2018. PMID: 28980173
-
Apical prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1815-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2172-1. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 24142057 Review.
-
Adoption of robotic sacrocolpopexy at an academic institution.JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):e2014.00237. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00237. JSLS. 2014. PMID: 25392622 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous