Perforator flaps: history, controversies, physiology, anatomy, and use in reconstruction
- PMID: 19337067
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819f2c6a
Perforator flaps: history, controversies, physiology, anatomy, and use in reconstruction
Abstract
Perforator flaps have the advantages of reduced donor-site morbidity, versatility to accurately replace the components required at the recipient site, a longer pedicle than is achievable with the parent musculocutaneous flap, and freedom from orientation of the pedicle. Their development has followed our understanding of the blood supply from a source artery to the skin, which has been achieved because of landmark studies by Manchot, Salmon, Milton, Taylor, and others. Many articles now attest to the safety and reliability of perforator flaps. This review aims to outline the history and controversies surrounding perforator flaps and to describe the anatomy of the "workhorse" perforator flaps and their use in microsurgical reconstruction. These flaps include the deep inferior epigastric artery, the anterolateral thigh, the thoracodorsal artery, and the superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps.
References
-
- Geddes CR, Morris SF, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: Evolution, classification and applications. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:90–99.
-
- Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC, eds. Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique and Clinical Application. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2006.
-
- Hallock GG. Direct and indirect perforator flaps: The history and the controversy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:855–865.
-
- McGregor IA, Morgan G. Axial and random pattern flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1973;26:202–213.
-
- Milton SH. Pedicled skin-flaps: The fallacy of the length:width ratio. Br J Surg. 1970;57:502–508.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
