Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 May;104(5):1119-24.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.53. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial

Lorella Fanti et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May.

Erratum in

  • Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1613. Massimo, Agostoni [corrected to Agostoni, Massimo]; Marco, Gemma [corrected to Gemma, Marco]; Giulia, Gambino [corrected to Gambino, Giulia]; Antonio, Facciorusso [corrected to Facciorusso, Antonio]; Mario, Guslandi [corrected to Guslandi, Mario]; Giorgio,

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to compare patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction in terms of efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) during colonoscopy with that of a combination of midazolam and meperidine.

Methods: Sixty patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomly assigned to two groups. All of the patients received midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously for premedication. In the remifentanil group, a bolus dose of remifentanil was given, and a patient-controlled sedation analgesia (PCSA) pump was set to inject further bolus doses with no "lockout" time. Patients in the meperidine group received a bolus of meperidine and sham PCSA. Non-invasive arterial blood pressure, electrocardiography, and pulse oximetry were monitored throughout the study. The Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale (OAA/S) was performed at baseline, every 5 min during, and after colonoscopy. Assessment of pain and satisfaction with sedoanalgesia was scheduled after colonoscopy and 24-72 h later by a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The technical difficulty of the examination and the gastroenterologist's satisfaction were assessed similarly.

Results: The degree of pain, the level of satisfaction with sedoanalgesia by patients and gastroenterologists, and the degree of difficulty experienced by the endoscopist were not different in the two groups. The time to reach an Aldrete score > or = 9 was significantly shorter in the remifentanil group (P < 0.0001); discharge times did not differ between the groups (P = 0.36). There was no difference between the groups regarding the duration of colonoscopy (P = 0.82) and the stability of vital signs. At the end of the procedure, OAA/S was significantly higher in the remifentanil group (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Remifentanil PCA is safe and effective to induce sedoanalgesia during colonoscopy. Further studies should address the optimization of dosing and lock out setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms