Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct;4(4):236-40.
doi: 10.4161/org.4.4.7151.

Allorecognition and chimerism in an invertebrate model organism

Affiliations

Allorecognition and chimerism in an invertebrate model organism

Fadi G Lakkis et al. Organogenesis. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

The presence of highly specific histocompatibility reactions in colonial marine invertebrates that lack adaptive immune systems (such as the sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans and ascidians) provides a unique opportunity to investigate the evolutionary roots of allorecognition and to explore whether homologous innate recognition systems exist in vertebrates. Conspecific interactions among adult animals in these groups are regulated by highly specific allorecognition systems that restrict somatic fusion to self or close kin. In Hydractinia (Cnidaria:Hydrozoa), fusion/rejection responses are controlled by two linked genetic loci. Alleles at each locus are co-dominantly inherited. Colonies fuse if they share at least one haplotype, reject if they share no haplotypes, and display transitory fusion if they share only one allele in a haplotype-a pattern that echoes natural killer cell responses in mice and humans. Allorecognition in Hydractinia and other marine invertebrates serves as a safeguard against stem cell or germline parasitism thus, limiting chimerism to closely related individuals. These animals fail to become tolerant even if exposed during early development to cells from a histoincompatible individual. Detailed analysis of the structure and function of molecules responsible for allorecognition in basal marine invertebrates could provide clues to the innate mechanisms by which higher animals respond to organ and cell allografts, including embryonic tissues.

Keywords: allorecognition; chimerism; innate immune system; invertebrate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hydractinia morphology. P, Polyp; M, Matt; S, Stolon.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fusion and rejection responses in Hydractinia. (A) fusion, (B) aggressive rejection and (C) passive rejection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Encounter between incompatible (allogeneic) Hydractinia colonies. (A) Two stolons of allogeneic colonies prior to contact, (B) at point of contact and (C) at the moment of nematocyst discharge (arrows point to nematocytes). Photo credit: Rolfe Lange.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Genetics of fusion and rejection in Hydractinia. (A) Two colonies reject if they do not share any haplotypes, (B and C) fuse if they share at least one haplotype, and (D) undergo transitory fusion if they share only one allele in a haplotype.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sykes M, Auchincloss H, Sachs D. Transplantation Immunology. In: Paul W, editor. Fundamental Immunology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. pp. 1481–1556.
    1. Welniak L, Blazar B, Murphy W. Immunobiology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:139–170. - PubMed
    1. Laird DJ, De Tomaso AW, Cooper MD, Weissman IL. 50 million years of chordate evolution: seeking the origins of adaptive immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:6924–6926. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Litman G, Cooper M. Why study the evolution of immunity? Nat Immunol. 2007;8:547–548. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janeway CJ. How the immune system works to protect the host from infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7461–7468. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources