Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Mar;23(1):1-5.
doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.1. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

The comparison of central and mean true-net power (Pentacam) in calculating IOL-power after refractive surgery

Jeong-Ho Yi  1 , Joo Youn Shin, Byoung Jin Ha, Sang Woo Kim, Beom Jin Cho, Eung Kweon Kim, Tae-im Kim
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The comparison of central and mean true-net power (Pentacam) in calculating IOL-power after refractive surgery

Jeong-Ho Yi et al. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of central true net corneal power (cTNP) and mean true net corneal power (mTNP) of the Pentacam system to give a keratometry (K) reading for calculating IOL (intraocular lens) power in eyes following refractive surgery.

Methods: Refraction, an automated K-reading (Km), cTNP and mTNP were measured for 15 eyes that required cataract surgery and had previously undergone refractive surgery. The difference between postoperative manifest refraction values and target refraction values calculated with the SRK/T formula using cTNP were compared with the one using mTNP.

Results: The mean deviation from the desired post-cataract refractive outcome was 0.60 diopter (D)+/-0.47 (standard deviation) using cTNP; 0.75+/-0.54 using mTNP (p=0.386). The actual refraction was within +/-0.50D of the intended refraction for 60% (cTNP) and 33.3% (mTNP) of eyes, and within +/-1.00D for 93% (cTNP) and 66.7% (mTNP) of eyes.

Conclusions: Although not statistically significant, the cTNP showed better accuracy than mTNP to give a keratometry (K) reading for post-refractive surgery eyes requiring cataract surgery.

Keywords: Corneal true net power; Intraocular lens implantation; Pentacam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screen-map shot of the true net power map of the Pentacam system. The exact central K-value in the true net power map was used in this study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Schematic conceptual relationship between the anterior and posterior corneal curvature in the unaffected eye. Note that the two curves are approximately parallel. (B) Schematic conceptual corneal shape change after RK. Note that the two surfaces are near parallel, but they are significantly flatter than the unoperated cornea in A. (C) Schematic conceptualized drawing of corneal shape after excimer photoablation for myopia. Note that the anterior surface is considerably flatter than the posterior surface. (D) Schematic conceptualized drawing of the corneal shape after hyperopic excimer photoablation. Note that the anterior surface is steeper than the posterior surface.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gimbel H, Sun R, Kaye GB. Refractive error in cataract surgery after previous refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:142–144. - PubMed
    1. Holladay JT. Intraocular lens power calculations for the refractive surgeon. Oper Tech Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;1:105–117.
    1. Ishikawa T, Hirano A, Inoue J, et al. Trial for new intraocular lens power calculation following phototherapeutic keratectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000;44:400–406. - PubMed
    1. Aramberri J. Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: double-K method. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2063–2068. - PubMed
    1. Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, MacDonald MB. Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia. Cornea. 1997;16:517–524. - PubMed

Publication types