Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;117(3):344-7.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.11845. Epub 2008 Sep 19.

Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke in offices and hospitality venues: before-and-after study

Manel Nebot  1 , Maria J López, Carles Ariza, Mónica Pérez-Ríos, Marcela Fu, Anna Schiaffino, Gloria Muñoz, Esteve Saltó, Esteve Fernández; Spanish Smoking Law Evaluation Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke in offices and hospitality venues: before-and-after study

Manel Nebot et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Background/objectives: A smoking law was passed by the Spanish Parliament in December 2005 and was enforced by 1 January 2006. The law bans smoking in all indoor workplaces but only in some hospitality venues, because owners are allowed to establish a smoking zone (venues>100 m2) or to allow smoking without restrictions (venues<100 m2). The objective of the study is to assess the impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in enclosed workplaces, including hospitality venues.

Materials and methods: The study design is a before-and-after evaluation. We studied workplaces and hospitality venues from eight different regions of Spain. We took repeated samples of vapor-phase nicotine concentration in 398 premises, including private offices (162), public administration offices (90), university premises (43), bars and restaurants (79), and discotheques and pubs (24).

Results: In the follow-up period, SHS levels were markedly reduced in indoor offices. The median decrease in nicotine concentration ranged from 60.0% in public premises to 97.4% in private areas. Nicotine concentrations were also markedly reduced in bars and restaurants that became smoke-free (96.7%) and in the no-smoking zones of venues with separate spaces for smokers (88.9%). We found no significant changes in smoking zones or in premises allowing smoking, including discotheques and pubs.

Conclusions: Overall, this study shows the positive impact of the law on reducing SHS in indoor workplaces. However, SHS was substantially reduced only in bars and restaurants that became smoke-free. Most hospitality workers continue to be exposed to very high levels of SHS. Therefore, a 100% smoke-free policy for all hospitality venues is required.

Keywords: evaluation; hospitality sector; secondhand smoke; smoking law; workplaces.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Allwright S, Paul G, Greiner B, Mullally BJ, Pursell L, Kelly A, et al. Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study. BMJ. 2005;331(7525):1117–1122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borland R, Pierce JP, Burns DM, Gilpin E, Johnson M, Bal D. Protection from environmental tobacco smoke in California. The case for a smoke-free workplace. JAMA. 1992;268(6):749–752. - PubMed
    1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section and Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section; 1997.
    1. Chapman S, Borland R, Scollo M, Brownson RC, Dominello A, Woodward S. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(7):1018–1023. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cordoba R, Villalbi JR, Salvador T, Lopez-Garcia V. Spain’s process of passing effective smoking prevention legislation [in Spanish] Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2006;80(6):631–645. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances