Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul;73(4):512-26.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding)

Bernhard Hommel  1
Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding)

Bernhard Hommel. Psychol Res. 2009 Jul.
Free PMC article

Abstract

The theory of event coding (TEC) is a general framework explaining how perceived and produced events (stimuli and responses) are cognitively represented and how their representations interact to generate perception and action. This article discusses the implications of TEC for understanding the control of voluntary action and makes an attempt to apply, specify, and concretize the basic theoretical ideas in the light of the available research on action control. In particular, it is argued that the major control operations may take place long before a stimulus is encountered (the prepared-reflex principle), that stimulus-response translation may be more automatic than commonly thought, that action selection and execution are more interwoven than most approaches allow, and that the acquisition of action-contingent events (action effects) is likely to subserve both the selection and the evaluation of actions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
James’ (1890) neural model of acquiring ideomotor control (see text for explanation). Taken from James (, p. 582)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15155169', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15155169/'}]}
    2. Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior,3, 111–150. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17371493', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17371493/'}]}
    2. Akyürek, E. G., Riddell, P. M., Toffanin, P., & Hommel, B. (2007). Adaptive control of event integration: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology,44, 383–391. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '18505324', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18505324/'}]}
    2. Akyürek, E. G., Toffanin, P., & Hommel, B. (2008). Adaptive control of event integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,34, 569–577. - PubMed
    1. None
    2. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. XV, pp. 421–452). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    1. Band, G. P. H., van Steenbergen, H., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Falkenstein, M., & Hommel, B. (2008). Action-effect negativity: Evidence for the automatic detection of unexpected action effects (Submitted).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources