Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009:9:e01.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.305. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions

Martin Strandberg-Larsen  1 , Allan Krasnik
Affiliations

Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions

Martin Strandberg-Larsen et al. Int J Integr Care. 2009.

Abstract

Background: Integrated healthcare delivery is a policy goal of healthcare systems. There is no consensus on how to measure the concept, which makes it difficult to monitor progress.

Purpose: To identify the different types of methods used to measure integrated healthcare delivery with emphasis on structural, cultural and process aspects.

Methods: Medline/Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WHOLIS, and conventional internet search engines were systematically searched for methods to measure integrated healthcare delivery (published - April 2008).

Results: Twenty-four published scientific papers and documents met the inclusion criteria. In the 24 references we identified 24 different measurement methods; however, 5 methods shared theoretical framework. The methods can be categorized according to type of data source: a) questionnaire survey data, b) automated register data, or c) mixed data sources. The variety of concepts measured reflects the significant conceptual diversity within the field, and most methods lack information regarding validity and reliability.

Conclusion: Several methods have been developed to measure integrated healthcare delivery; 24 methods are available and some are highly developed. The objective governs the method best used. Criteria for sound measures are suggested and further developments should be based on an explicit conceptual framework and focus on simplifying and validating existing methods.

Keywords: integrated healthcare delivery; literature review; methods; quality of healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progress through the systematic review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Devers KJ, Shortell SM, Gillies RR, Anderson DA, Mitchell JB, Erickson KL. Implementing organized delivery systems: an integration scorecard. Health Care Management Review. 1994;9(3):7–20. - PubMed
    1. Starfield B. Primary care: balancing health needs, services and technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Gröne O, Garcia-Barbero M. Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European office for integrated health care services. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2001 Jun 1;1 Available from: http://www.ijic.org. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shortell SM, Kaluzny AD. Health care management: organisation design and behavior. 5th ed. New York: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2006.
    1. Epping-Jordan JE, Pruitt SD, Bengoa R, Wagner EH. Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):299–305. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources