Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Apr 7;15(13):1548-53.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1548.

Efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis

Roja Rahimi et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) as a therapeutic option for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. For the years 1966 until September 2008, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TCAs in the management of IBS. Seven randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials met our criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. TCAs used in the treatment arm of these trials included amitriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, doxepin and trimipramine. The pooled relative risk for clinical improvement with TCA therapy was 1.93 (95% CI: 1.44 to 2.6, P < 0.0001). Effect size of TCAs versus placebo for mean change in abdominal pain score among the two studies was -44.15 (95% CI: -53.27 to -35.04, P < 0.0001). It is concluded that low dose TCAs exhibit clinically and statistically significant control of IBS symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Outcome of “clinical response” in the studies considering TCAs vs placebo therapy. A: Individual and pooled relative risk; B: Heterogeneity indicators; C: Publication bias funnel plot.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pooled weighted mean difference for the outcome of “mean change in abdominal pain score” in the studies considering TCAs vs placebo.

References

    1. Videlock EJ, Chang L. Irritable bowel syndrome: current approach to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:665–685, x. - PubMed
    1. Evidence-based position statement on the management of irritable bowel syndrome in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:S1–S5. - PubMed
    1. Wilson S, Roberts L, Roalfe A, Bridge P, Singh S. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome: a community survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:495–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Croghan A, Heitkemper MM. Recognizing and managing patients with irritable bowel syndrome. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2005;17:51–59. - PubMed
    1. Longstreth GF, Wilson A, Knight K, Wong J, Chiou CF, Barghout V, Frech F, Ofman JJ. Irritable bowel syndrome, health care use, and costs: a U.S. managed care perspective. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:600–607. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms