Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 19;1(2):22.
doi: 10.1186/gm22.

Commercialization, patenting and genomics: researcher perspectives

Affiliations

Commercialization, patenting and genomics: researcher perspectives

Cj Murdoch et al. Genome Med. .

Abstract

The impact of commercialization and patenting pressure on genomics research is still a topic of considerable debate in academic, policy and popular literature. We interviewed genomic researchers to see if their perspectives offered fresh insights. Regional Genome Canada centers provided us with relevant researcher contact information, and in-depth structured interviews were conducted. Researcher perspectives were sharply divided, with both support and concern for commercialization regimes surfacing in interviews. Data withholding and publication delays were commonly reported, but the aggressive enforcement of patents was not. There are parallels to the Stem Cell community in Canada in these respects. Genomic researchers, as individuals directly implicated in the field of controversy, have developed varied and often novel insights which should be incorporated into the ongoing debates surrounding commercialization and patenting. Many researchers continue to raise concerns, particularly in relation to data withholding, thus emphasizing the need for a continued exploration of the complex issues associated with commercialization and patenting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pie chart showing the opinions of the researchers interviewed on the overall impact of patents on the research environment.

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Academic-industrial relationships in the life sciences. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2452–2459. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr035460. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vallas SP, Kleinman DL. Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: the confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology. Socioecon Rev. 2007. pp. 1–29.
    1. Rothman DJ. Academic medical centers and financial conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2008;299:695–697. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.695. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemmens T. Leopards in the temple: restoring scientific integrity to the commercialized research scene. J Law Med Ethics. 2004;32:641–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb01969.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell EG, Clarridge BR, Gokhale M, Birenbaum L, Hilgartner S, Holtzman NA, Blumenthal D. Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. JAMA. 2002;287:473–480. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.4.473. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources