Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Apr;59(561):e93-100.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420310.

Ordering blood tests for patients with unexplained fatigue in general practice: what does it yield? Results of the VAMPIRE trial

Hèlen Koch  1 , Marloes A van Bokhoven, Gerben ter Riet, Jm Tineke van Alphen-Jager, Trudy van der Weijden, Geert-Jan Dinant, Patrick J E Bindels
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Ordering blood tests for patients with unexplained fatigue in general practice: what does it yield? Results of the VAMPIRE trial

Hèlen Koch et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Unexplained fatigue is frequently encountered in general practice. Because of the low prior probability of underlying somatic pathology, the positive predictive value of abnormal (blood) test results is limited in such patients.

Aim: The study objectives were to investigate the relationship between established diagnoses and the occurrence of abnormal blood test results among patients with unexplained fatigue; to survey the effects of the postponement of test ordering on this relationship; and to explore consultation-related determinants of abnormal test results.

Design of study: Cluster randomised trial.

Setting: General practices of 91 GPs in the Netherlands.

Method: GPs were randomised to immediate or postponed blood-test ordering. Patients with new unexplained fatigue were included. Limited and expanded sets of blood tests were ordered either immediately or after 4 weeks. Diagnoses during the 1-year follow-up period were extracted from medical records. Two-by-two tables were generated. To establish independent determinants of abnormal test results, a multivariate logistic regression model was used.

Results: Data of 325 patients were analysed (71% women; mean age 41 years). Eight per cent of patients had a somatic illness that was detectable by blood-test ordering. The number of false-positive test results increased in particular in the expanded test set. Patients rarely re-consulted after 4 weeks. Test postponement did not affect the distribution of patients over the two-by-two tables. No independent consultation-related determinants of abnormal test results were found.

Conclusion: Results support restricting the number of tests ordered because of the increased risk of false-positive test results from expanded test sets. Although the number of re-consulting patients was small, the data do not refute the advice to postpone blood-test ordering for medical reasons in patients with unexplained fatigue in general practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total numbers of patients in randomised (sub)groups and actual re-consultation and blood-test ordering figures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Dinant GJ, van Wijk MAM, Janssens HJEM, et al. Dutch College of General Practitioners guideline ‘Blood testing. General principles and use by GP’ [NHG-standaard Bloedonderzoek. Algemene principes en uitvoering in eigen beheer; In Dutch] Huisarts Wet. 1994;37:202–211.
    1. Koch H, van Bokhoven MA, ter RG, et al. Demographic characteristics and quality of life of patients with unexplained complaints: a descriptive study in general practice. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(9):1483–1489. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kenter EG, Okkes IM, Oskam SK, Lamberts H. Tiredness in Dutch family practice. Data on patients complaining of and/or diagnosed with ‘tiredness’. Fam tract. 2003;20(4):434–440. - PubMed
    1. Dekay ML, Asch DA. Is the defensive use of diagnostic tests good for patients, or bad? Med Decis Making. 1998;18(1):19–28. - PubMed
    1. Owens DK. Defensive diagnostic testing — a case of stolen utility? Med Decis Making. 1998;18(1):33–34. - PubMed

Publication types