Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals
- PMID: 19343074
- PMCID: PMC2352144
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005
Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals
Abstract
The study of mentoring has generally been conducted within disciplinary silos with a specific type of mentoring relationship as a focus. The purpose of this article is to quantitatively review the three major areas of mentoring research (youth, academic, workplace) to determine the overall effect size associated with mentoring outcomes for protégés. We also explored whether the relationship between mentoring and protégé outcomes varied by the type of mentoring relationship (youth, academic, workplace). Results demonstrate that mentoring is associated with a wide range of favorable behavioral, attitudinal, health-related, relational, motivational, and career outcomes, although the effect size is generally small. Some differences were also found across type of mentoring. Generally, larger effect sizes were detected for academic and workplace mentoring compared to youth mentoring. Implications for future research, theory, and applied practice are provided.
References
-
- Ainsworth MDS. Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist. 1989;44:709–716. - PubMed
-
- Allen TD. Mentoring others: A dispositional and motivational approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2003;62:134–154.
-
- Allen TD, Eby LT. Common bonds: An integrative perspective on mentoring. In: Allen TD, Eby LT, editors. Blackwell handbook of mentoring. Oxford: Blackwell; (in press)
-
- Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Outcomes associated with mentoring protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004;89:127–136. - PubMed
-
- Austin AE. Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education. 2002;73:94–122.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources