Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;467(9):2414-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0811-0. Epub 2009 Apr 3.

Correlations between knee society function scores and functional force measures

Affiliations

Correlations between knee society function scores and functional force measures

Cale A Jacobs et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Subjective evaluations often are used after knee arthroplasty to quantify function; however, these scores may be influenced by pain and/or function of the nonoperated limb. Multiple influences increase variability of these scores, which in turn may result in a greater change in score required to be considered clinically important. We determined the relationships among the Knee Society pain and function scores, range of motion (ROM), and functional force measures of the surgically treated and nonoperated limbs. Before and 3 months after total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, 36 patients answered questions necessary to calculate the Knee Society pain and function scores. A dual-force platform was used to record the lift-up force of each limb during a stepping task. Function scores were correlated to pain scores, lift-up force of the nonoperated limb, and ROM before surgery. After surgery, function scores correlated with pain scores but not with objective functional measures or ROM. As patient-reported function scores and functional force measures of the surgically treated limb seem to provide distinctly different information, both measures may need to be collected after knee arthroplasty to fully understand a patient's functional recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 1A–B
The images show a patient performing the step-up-and-over test. A 10.2-cm-high box is placed on a force plate. (A) The patient steps onto the box with the test leg, brings the other foot onto the box, (B) steps down with the nontest leg, and then brings the test leg down onto the force plate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P, Altman R, Brandt K, Dougados M, Lequesne M, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis: consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:799–802. - PubMed
    1. Currier D. Elements of Research in Physical Therapy. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1990.
    1. Vet H, Terwee C, Ostelo R, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;5:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-54. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Felson D, Lawrence R, Hochberg M, McAlindon T, Dieppe PA, Minor MA, Blair SN, Berman BM, Fries JF, Weinberger M, Lorig KR, Jacobs JJ, Goldberg V. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2. treatment approaches. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:726–737. - PubMed
    1. Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott W. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14. - PubMed

Publication types