Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 5:9:97.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-97.

Process and impact evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment

Affiliations

Process and impact evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment

Kaaren R Mathias et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: despite health impact assessment (HIA) being increasingly widely used internationally, fundamental questions about its impact on decision-making, implementation and practices remain. In 2005 a collaboration between public health and local government authorities performed an HIA on the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Options paper in New Zealand. The findings of this were incorporated into the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy.

Methods: using multiple qualitative methodologies including key informant interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, this study performs process and impact evaluations of the Christchurch HIA including evaluation of costs and resource use.

Results: the evaluation found that the HIA had demonstrable direct impacts on planning and implementation of the final Urban Development Strategy as well as indirect impacts on understandings and ways of working within and between organisations. It also points out future directions and ways of working in this successful collaboration between public health and local government authorities. It summarises the modest resource use and discusses the important role HIA can play in urban planning with intersectoral collaboration and enhanced relationships as both catalysts and outcomes of the HIA process.

Conclusion: as one of the few evaluations of HIA that have been published to date, this paper makes a substantial contribution to the literature on the impact, utility and effectiveness of HIA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Centre for Health Policy . Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach. Brussels: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1999. http://www.euro.who.int/document/pae/gothenburgpaper.pdf
    1. Signal L, Durham G. Health Impact Assessment in the New Zealand policy context. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2000;15:11–26.
    1. Mahoney M, Morgan RK. Health Impact Assessment in Australia and New Zealand: an exploration of methodological concerns. Promotion & Education. 2001;8:8–11. doi: 10.1177/102538230100800104. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Health . Health Impact Assessment Guidelines. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Health; 1995.
    1. Public Health Advisory Committee . A guide to Health Impact Assessment: a policy tool for New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee; 2005.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources