Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Oct;1790(10):963-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

Genome instability, cancer and aging

Affiliations
Review

Genome instability, cancer and aging

Alexander Y Maslov et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

DNA damage-driven genome instability underlies the diversity of life forms generated by the evolutionary process but is detrimental to the somatic cells of individual organisms. The cellular response to DNA damage can be roughly divided in two parts. First, when damage is severe, programmed cell death may occur or, alternatively, temporary or permanent cell cycle arrest. This protects against cancer but can have negative effects on the long term, e.g., by depleting stem cell reservoirs. Second, damage can be repaired through one or more of the many sophisticated genome maintenance pathways. However, erroneous DNA repair and incomplete restoration of chromatin after damage is resolved, produce mutations and epimutations, respectively, both of which have been shown to accumulate with age. An increased burden of mutations and/or epimutations in aged tissues increases cancer risk and adversely affects gene transcriptional regulation, leading to progressive decline in organ function. Cellular degeneration and uncontrolled cell proliferation are both major hallmarks of aging. Despite the fact that one seems to exclude the other, they both may be driven by a common mechanism. Here, we review age-related changes in the mammalian genome and their possible functional consequences, with special emphasis on genome instability in stem/progenitor cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Of the two major branches of genome maintenance, DNA repair aims to restore the original situation by remwing the lesion, while the complex of DNA-damage signaling pathways assists in these repair activities or initiates cellular responses that kill or terminate mitotic activity of a cell when it is beyond repair.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Age-related, cell functional divergence as a consequence of stochastic effects. Functional decline is indicated by increasing darkness of shading. Even in a young tissue, the function of highly differentiated cells in an organ or tissue is never maximized. The old tissue is different in the sense that there are many more cells that have suffered functional decline, with some of them dying (†) or eliminated (open space). Others have grown into a hyperplastic or neoplastic lesions (hatched) or have been replaced by fibrosis (not shown).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hypothetical relationship between aging, cancer and stem cells (SC). Various endogenous and exogenous factors (e.g., ROS, replication errors, environmental hazards) cause DNA damage, also in stem cells. Among the cellular responses to DNA damage, apoptosis and senescence lead to attrition of stem cell populations, while DNA repair may lead to errors increasing both cancer risk and adversely affect function. Hence, cancer and non-cancer, degenerative dysfunction can both be consequences of stem cells' responses to DNA damage.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The optimal balance between maintaining the number of stem cells (“quantity”) and eliminating severely damaged stem cells (“quality”) ensures maximal longevity free of cancer and degenerative changes. Shifts towards one or the other extreme will impair longevity by development of degenerative dysfunction due to exhaustion of regenerative capacity or cancer due to accumulation of proliferation competent cells with significant mutation/epimutation load.

References

    1. de Duve C. The onset of selection. Nature. 2005;433:581–582. - PubMed
    1. Friedberg EC, Walker GR, Siede W, Wood RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. 2nd ASM Press; Washington: 2006.
    1. Charlesworth B. Fisher, Medawar, Hamilton and the evolution of aging. Genetics. 2000;156:927–931. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirkwood TB. Evolution of ageing. Nature. 1977;270:301–304. - PubMed
    1. Vijg J. Aging of the Genome. Oxford University Press; New York: 2007.

Publication types