Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and 2 nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV: 96-week analysis
- PMID: 19349870
- DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a56de5
Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and 2 nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV: 96-week analysis
Abstract
Background: The OK04 trial has shown that 48 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was noninferior to continuation of triple therapy with 2 nucleosides and lopinavir-ritonavir in patients with prior stable suppression. However, it is still uncertain if this experimental strategy can maintain suppression in the long term.
Methods: Patients entered this noninferiority trial (upper limit 95% confidence interval: +12%) with no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor and receiving 2 nucleosides plus lopinavir/ritonavir, with HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter for more than 6 months. Primary end point was percent of patients without therapeutic failure, defined as confirmed HIV RNA >500 copies per milliliter with exclusion of monotherapy patients who resuppressed to <50 copies per milliliter after resuming baseline nucleosides, or loss to follow-up, or change of randomized therapy other than reinduction.
Results: Through 96 weeks, percentage of patient without therapeutic failure was 87% (monotherapy, n = 100) vs. 78% (triple therapy, n = 98; 95% confidence interval: -20% to +1.2%). Percentage with HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter (intention to treat, missing = failure, reinduction = failure): 77% (monotherapy) vs. 78% (triple therapy). Low-level viral rebound was more frequent in the monotherapy group. Twelve patients in the monotherapy group (12%) needed reinduction with nucleosides. Discontinuations due to adverse events were significantly more frequent in the triple therapy group (8%) than in the monotherapy group (0%); P = 0.003.
Conclusions: At 96-week lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was noninferior to continuation of triple therapy. Incidence of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was significantly lower with monotherapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114933).
Comment in
-
Assessment of baseline HIV viral load as a risk factor for loss of virologic suppression in protease inhibitor-based monotherapy trials.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Apr;53(5):669; author reply 670. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181befc0a. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010. PMID: 20335746 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and two nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV.AIDS. 2008 Jan 11;22(2):F1-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f4243b. AIDS. 2008. PMID: 18097218 Clinical Trial.
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir as single-drug therapy for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression: 48-week results of a randomized, controlled, open-label, proof-of-concept pilot clinical trial (OK Study).J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005 Nov 1;40(3):280-7. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000180077.59159.f4. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005. PMID: 16249701 Clinical Trial.
-
Lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir for the initial treatment of HIV infection.N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 27;346(26):2039-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012354. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12087139 Clinical Trial.
-
[The "induction-maintenance" strategy].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2008 Dec;26 Suppl 16:8-11. doi: 10.1016/s0213-005x(08)76604-7. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2008. PMID: 19572438 Review. Spanish.
-
[Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection: the emergence of resistance].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2008 Dec;26 Suppl 16:34-40. doi: 10.1016/s0213-005x(08)76609-6. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2008. PMID: 19572443 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
HIV-1 subtype influences susceptibility and response to monotherapy with the protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jan;70(1):243-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku365. Epub 2014 Sep 16. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015. PMID: 25228587 Free PMC article.
-
Differential effects of viremia and microbial translocation on immune activation in HIV-infected patients throughout ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(17):e781. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000781. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 25929922 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with rilpivirine and boosted darunavir in treatment-experienced patients with advanced HIV infection: a preliminary 24 week analysis (RIDAR study).BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3817-6. BMC Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 30819101 Free PMC article.
-
Abacavir-based triple nucleoside regimens for maintenance therapy in patients with HIV.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;2013(6):CD008270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008270.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23740608 Free PMC article.
-
Individualized Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy: The Role of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenetics in an Aged and Heavily Treated HIV-Infected Patient.Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Nov;39(11):1125-1131. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00829-x. Clin Drug Investig. 2019. PMID: 31401737
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical