Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Apr;101(4):714-9.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel

Affiliations
  • PMID: 19350116
Comparative Study

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel

Dirk Sibbing et al. Thromb Haemost. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Patients receiving dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel are commonly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Attenuating effects on platelet response to clopidogrel have been reported solely for the PPI omeprazole. PPIs differ in their metabolisation properties as well as their potential for drug-drug interactions. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different PPIs (pantoprazole, omeprazole, esomeprazole) on platelet response to clopidogrel in patients with previous coronary stent placement under chronic clopidogrel treatment. In a cross-sectional observational study, consecutive patients under clopidogrel maintenance treatment (n = 1,000) scheduled for a control coronary angiography were enrolled. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation (in AU*min) was measured with multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA). From the entire study population, 268 (26.8%) patients were under PPI treatment at the time point of platelet function testing (pantoprazole, n = 162; omeprazole, n = 64; esomeprazole, n = 42). Platelet aggregation (median [interquartile range]) was significantly higher in patients with omeprazole treatment (295.5 [193.5-571.2] AU*min) compared to patients without PPI treatment (220.0 [143.8-388.8] AU*min; p = 0.001). Platelet aggregation was similar in patients with pantoprazole (226.0 [150.0-401.5] AU*min) or esomeprazole (209.0 [134.8-384.8] AU*min) treatment compared to patients without PPI treatment (p = 0.69 and p = 0.88, respectively). Attenuating effects of concomitant PPI treatment on platelet response to clopidogrel were restricted to the use of omeprazole. No attenuating effects on platelet response to clopidogrel were observed for pantoprazole or esomeprazole. Specifically designed and randomized clinical studies are needed to define the impact of concomitant PPI treatment on adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms