Role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer
- PMID: 19353274
- DOI: 10.1007/s11864-009-0086-4
Role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer
Abstract
Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in women in the United States with an estimated number of 40,100 women diagnosed in 2008, the great majority of which belongs to endometrial classification. The traditional approach to treatment of endometrial cancer has been primarily surgery via an open, laparotomy incision. Minimally invasive approaches with smaller incisions, i.e., laparoscopy for the management of endometrial cancer was initially reported in 1992; however, its adoption has been slow due to the prolonged learning curve needed to become proficient in such a technique. Robotic-assisted surgery, a further advancement of traditional laparoscopy, using computer-based controls has been developed enabling the performance of complex procedures that otherwise had been too difficult to accomplish in a minimally invasive fashion. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is one such example that has gained rapid acceptance in recent years. Although the use of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for endometrial cancer is still in its early phase, this approach is anticipated to become similarly, a common approach to the management of endometrial cancer in the future.
Similar articles
-
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20955983
-
Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27288987 Clinical Trial.
-
Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(3):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 18. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26602025
-
Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;24(1):14-23. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834daebc. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22123220 Review.
-
The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;112(7):761-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.23988. Epub 2015 Aug 19. J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26385835 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 1;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0544-x. BMC Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 29716555 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:181963. doi: 10.1155/2010/181963. Epub 2010 Jun 23. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010. PMID: 20613992 Free PMC article.
-
Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution.J Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(4):303-12. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.4.303. Epub 2013 Oct 2. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013. PMID: 24167665 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;142(10):2173-83. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2180-x. Epub 2016 May 23. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27217038 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1222-30. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1222. Yonsei Med J. 2014. PMID: 25048478 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical