Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov;1(6):729-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

Magnetic resonance cardiac vein imaging: relation to mitral valve annulus and left circumflex coronary artery

Affiliations
Free article

Magnetic resonance cardiac vein imaging: relation to mitral valve annulus and left circumflex coronary artery

Amedeo Chiribiri et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate in vivo anatomical relationships between the coronary sinus-great cardiac vein (CS-GCV), the mitral valve annulus (MVA), and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Background: The CS-GCV has become an anatomical structure of interest because it provides a way of access to the heart for a number of interventional procedures. Previous reports demonstrate that the postulated close anatomical proximity of the CS-GCV to the MVA does not always hold true in patients, both in autopsy specimens and in vivo by computed tomography.

Methods: In 31 participants (24 volunteers and 7 patients; 15 men; 42 +/- 19 years), cardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed for noninvasive evaluation of the coronary sinus and of the coronary arteries using whole-heart imaging and intravascular contrast agents. Three-dimensional reconstructions, standard orthogonal planes, and unprocessed raw data were used to assess CS-GCV anatomy and its relation to the MVA and the LCX along their entire course.

Results: The CS-GCV was located behind the left atrium in all examined participants, at a minimum distance of 8.6 +/- 3.9 mm from the MVA. In 80% of the participants, the LCX crossed the CS-GCV inferiorly, between the CS-GCV and the MVA. The CS-GCV and the LCX had a parallel course for 26.2 +/- 23.0 mm, with great variability of location and length. In several participants, the CS-GCV had a long parallel course, but in other participants, the LCX crossed below the CS-GCV at a discrete point.

Conclusions: In all participants, the CS-GCV coursed behind the left atrium rather than behind the MVA. In the majority of the participants, the LCX coursed between the CS-GCV and the MVA. These anatomical relationships should be kept in mind when referring a patient for interventional procedures requiring the access to the CS-GCV, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance might provide important information for the selection of candidates for these procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources