Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;109(1):18-23.
doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp059. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

A toxicology for the 21st century--mapping the road ahead

Affiliations

A toxicology for the 21st century--mapping the road ahead

Thomas Hartung. Toxicol Sci. 2009 May.

Abstract

The landmark publication by the National Research Council putting forward a vision of a toxicology for the 21st century in 2007 has created an atmosphere of departure in our field. The alliances formed, symposia and meetings held and the articles following are remarkable, indicating that this is an idea whose time has come. Most of the discussion centers on the technical opportunities to map pathways of toxicity and the financing of the program. Here, the other part of the work ahead shall be discussed, that is, the focus is on regulatory implementation once the technological challenges are managed, but we are well aware that the technical aspects of what the National Academy of Science report suggests still need to be addressed: A series of challenges are put forward which we will face in addition to finding a technical solution (and its funding) to set this vision into practice. This includes the standardization and quality assurance of novel methodologies, their formal validation, their integration into test strategies including threshold setting and finally a global acceptance and implementation. This will require intense conceptual steering to have all pieces of the puzzle come together.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
The continuous process of development, integration and acceptance of new methods.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
The steps necessary after the technical solutions to arrive at a new approach of regulatory toxicology.

References

    1. Ahr H-J, Alepee N, Breier S, Brekelmans C, Cotgreave I, Gribaldo L, Dal negro G, De Silva O, Hartung T, Lacerda A, et al. Barriers to validation. A report by European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to animal testing (EPAA) working group 5. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2008;36:459–464. - PubMed
    1. ALTEX. EU/USA: A transatlantic think tank of toxicology (T4) ALTEX Altern. Anim. Exp. 2008;25:361.
    1. Andersen ME, Krewski D. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: Bringing the vision to life. Toxicol. Sci. 2009;107:324–330. - PubMed
    1. Balls M, Amcoff P, Bremer S, Casati S, Coecke S, Clothier R, Combes R, Corvi R, Curren R, Eskes C, et al. The principles of weight of evidence validation of test methods and testing strategies. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 58. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2006;34:603–620. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bottini AA, Alepee N, De Silva O, Hartung T, Hendriksen C, Kuil J, Pazos P, Philips B, Rhein C, Schiffelers M-J, et al. Optimization of the post-validation process. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 67. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2008;36:353–366. - PubMed