Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall
- PMID: 19358013
- DOI: 10.1080/09658210902802959
Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall
Abstract
Two experiments examined the notion that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) are partially due to differences in search set size in cued recall. High and low WMC individuals performed variants of a cued recall task with either unrelated cue words (Experiment 1) or specific cue phrases (Experiment 2). Across both experiments low WMC individuals recalled fewer items, made more errors, and had longer correct recall latencies than high WMC individuals. Cross-experimental analyses suggested that providing participants with more specific cues decreased the size of the search set, leading to better recall overall. However, these effects were equivalent for high and low WMC. It is argued that these results are consistent with a search model framework in which low WMC individuals search through a larger set of items than high WMC individuals.
Similar articles
-
Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1020-34. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1020. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007. PMID: 17983310
-
The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):240-7. doi: 10.1037/a0017739. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20053060
-
Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2397-410. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.690438. Epub 2012 Jul 16. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012. PMID: 22800472
-
A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1282-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1220-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28108977 Review.
-
Sex differences in verbal working memory: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychol Bull. 2021 Apr;147(4):352-398. doi: 10.1037/bul0000320. Psychol Bull. 2021. PMID: 34166005
Cited by
-
Similarities and differences between working memory and long-term memory: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):471-483. doi: 10.1037/a0018405. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20192543 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: a latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall.Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):837-49. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.837. Mem Cognit. 2009. PMID: 19679863
-
Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):898-911. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0408-z. Mem Cognit. 2014. PMID: 24615717
-
High working memory capacity predicts less retrieval induced forgetting.PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052806. Epub 2013 Jan 11. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23326359 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.Mem Cognit. 2018 Oct;46(7):1149-1163. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0827-3. Mem Cognit. 2018. PMID: 29845592
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources