Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009;26(3):209-30.
doi: 10.2165/00002512-200926030-00003.

Secondary stroke prevention strategies for the oldest patients: possibilities and challenges

Affiliations
Review

Secondary stroke prevention strategies for the oldest patients: possibilities and challenges

Cheryl D Bushnell et al. Drugs Aging. 2009.

Abstract

Older adults are not only at higher risk of experiencing stroke, but also have multiple co-morbidities that make treatment for secondary stroke prevention challenging. Very few clinical trials specifically related to secondary stroke prevention treatment efficacy have focused on the oldest-old (>or=85 years) and, therefore, evidence-based recommendations for treatment specific to this population are not available. Some of the special considerations for stroke prevention treatments in older patients include careful titration of blood-pressure-lowering drugs to avoid hypotension, the risk of haemorrhagic stroke with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and weighing the risk of recurrent ischaemia versus bleeding in patients taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. The risk of peri-procedural complications appears to be high with both carotid angioplasty and stenting and carotid endarterectomy in older patients with carotid stenosis. Other common issues in older patients include adverse drug events, recognizing the risk of dementia, depression and osteoporosis and deciding when to discontinue secondary stroke prevention. In this review, we provide the practitioner with the evidence related to specific approaches to secondary stroke prevention in older patients, and identify the knowledge gaps that currently limit our ability to appropriately treat this vulnerable population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Cathleen Colón-Emeric has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Survival in patients aged ≥85 years with first and recurrent stroke: (a) males and (b) females. Open triangles represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival curve in patients with first stroke; lines represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival curve for patients with recurrent stroke. Open squares and closed circles represent the upper and lower 95% confidence limits (reproduced from Samsa et al.,[9] with permission).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117 (4):e25–146. - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Garrett E, Klag MJ, et al. Trends in stroke prevalence between 1973 and 1991 in the US population 25 to 74 years of age. Stroke. 2002;33 (5):1209–13. - PubMed
    1. Kaplan RC, Tirschwell DL, Longstreth WT, Jr, et al. Vascular events, mortality, and preventive therapy following ischemic stroke in the elderly. Neurology. 2005;65 (6):835–42. - PubMed
    1. Clark TG, Murphy MF, Rothwell PM. Long term risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death in “low risk” patients with a non-recent transient ischaemic attack. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74 (5):577–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coull AJ, Lovett JK, Rothwell PM. Population based study of early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: implications for public education and organisation of services [abstract] BMJ. 2004;328 (7435):326. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types