Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 9:9:100.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-100.

Use of diagnostic self-tests on body materials among Internet users in the Netherlands: prevalence and correlates of use

Gaby Ronda  1 , Piet Portegijs, Geert-Jan Dinant, Frank Buntinx, Roelf Norg, Trudy van der Weijden
Affiliations

Use of diagnostic self-tests on body materials among Internet users in the Netherlands: prevalence and correlates of use

Gaby Ronda et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: A range of self-tests on body materials has become available to the general public, but the extent of their use has hardly been studied. This study examined how many people use diagnostic self-tests on body materials such as blood or urine, as well as the type of tests that are used, and factors associated with their use.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey. Participants were recruited from an existing Dutch Internet panel of 12,529 persons, and information was collected by means of a structured Internet-based questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess correlates of self-test use.

Results: Response to the survey was 63%. Sixteen percent of the respondents said they had ever used at least one self-test, with a mean of 2.1 tests per self-tester. The most frequently reported self-tests were those for diabetes and cholesterol. Self-testers generally reported lower health status and had a higher BMI than non-testers. On the other hand, they were more likely to engage in health-related behaviour such as the use of dietary supplements and homeopathic medicine.

Conclusion: Self-testing proved to be relatively prevalent among Dutch Internet users. We therefore think that it is essential to develop appropriate information for consumers, health care providers and policymakers, about the pros and cons of self-testing and specific self-tests. More test-specific research is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Weijden T Van der, Ronda G, Norg R, Portegijs P, Buntinx F, Dinant GJ. Diagnostische zelftests op lichaamsmateriaal: aanbod, validiteit en gebruik door de consument [Diagnostic self-tests on body materials: availability, validity and frequency of use] Maastricht: Maastricht University, School for Public Health and Primary Care (Caphri); 2007.
    1. Ryan A, Greenfield S, Wilson S. Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study. Study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:193. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-193. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryan A, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Clifford S, McManus RJ, Pattison HM. Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey. J Public Health. 2006;28:370–374. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell S, Klein R. Home Testing to detect human immunodeficiency virus: boon or bane? J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3473–3476. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01511-06. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hopkins Tanne J. Direct to consumer medical tests are offered in United States. BMJ. 2006;333:12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7557.12-a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types