Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 Aug;30(7):1357-9.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1574. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

Percutaneous cement augmentations of malignant lesions of the sacrum and pelvis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Percutaneous cement augmentations of malignant lesions of the sacrum and pelvis

B A Georgy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Although cement augmentation has been described in the literature for the treatment of benign sacral insufficiency fractures, only a few case reports have described the procedure's usage in the treatment of malignant lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, safety, and clinical outcome for percutaneous cement augmentation of patients with malignant lesions in the sacrum and pelvis.

Materials and methods: A prospective study of 12 patients (7 men and 5 women) with a median age of 64.5 years was conducted under appropriate institutional review board protocol. Patients had different types of malignant metastatic lesions of the sacrum and pelvic bones. All but 1 patient underwent preprocedure CT and MR imaging. All patients had a postprocedure CT, and all but 1 had sacral lesions. Six patients had a second lesion in the iliac bones. Under CT guidance, percutaneous cement augmentation was performed in 8 cases and under fluoroscopy guidance in 2 cases. In 2 cases, needles were placed under CT guidance, and the injection was performed under fluoroscopy. In 5 patients, a single needle was used; in another 5 patients, 2 needles were used. One patient had 3 needles, and another patient required 4 needles.

Results: Adequate cement deposition was seen in all cases. Three patients had minimal clinically insignificant cement leakage. All treated patients (except 1 patient) reported decreased pain level with use of the visual analog scale (VAS) within 2 to 4 weeks of follow-up. No other subsequent surgical interventions were required.

Conclusions: Percutaneous cement augmentation of metastatic lesions of the sacrum and pelvic bones is a feasible and safe technique that can be performed under CT or fluoroscopic guidance. The technique results in decreased pain relief on short-term follow-up that can allow patients to tolerate future treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
A 44-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer to the sacrum and lumbar spine. A, Axial T1-weighted image showing the tumor extension with low signal intensity involving the right sacral ala and most of the body of S1 vertebra. B, Corresponding axial CT image showing the extent of the tumor. C, Axial CT image showing placement of 2 needles. D and E, Postprocedure CT images showing the final distribution of the cement. Patient VAS score went from 9/10 before the procedure to 2/10 at the follow-up visit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brook AL, Mirsky DM, Bello JA. Computerized tomography guided sacroplasty: a practical treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture: case report. Spine 2005;30:E450–54 - PubMed
    1. Deen HG, Nottmeier EW. Balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Report of three cases. Neurosurg Focus 2005;18:e7 - PubMed
    1. Garant M. Sacroplasty: a new treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:1265–67 - PubMed
    1. Pommersheim W, Huang-Hellinger F, Baker M, et al. Sacroplasty: a treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1003–07 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strub WM, Hoffmann M, Ernst RJ, et al. Sacroplasty by CT and fluoroscopic guidance: is the procedure right for your patient? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:38–41 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types