Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 10:8:62.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-62.

Identifying the most productive breeding sites for malaria mosquitoes in The Gambia

Affiliations

Identifying the most productive breeding sites for malaria mosquitoes in The Gambia

Ulrike Fillinger et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Ideally larval control activities should be targeted at sites that generate the most adult vectors, thereby reducing operational costs. Despite the plethora of potential mosquito breeding sites found in the floodplains of the Gambia River, about 150 km from its mouth, during the rainy season, only a small proportion are colonized by anophelines on any day. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of larval habitats most frequently and most densely populated by anopheline larvae and to estimate the numbers of adults produced in different habitats.

Methods: A case-control design was used to identify characteristics of sites with or without mosquitoes. Sites were surveyed for their physical water properties and invertebrate fauna. The characteristics of 83 sites with anopheline larvae (cases) and 75 sites without (controls) were collected between June and November 2005. Weekly adult productivity was estimated with emergence traps in water-bodies commonly containing larvae.

Results: The presence of anopheline larvae was associated with high invertebrate diversity (Odds Ratio, OR 11.69, 95% CI 5.61-24.34, p < 0.001), the presence of emergent vegetation (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.35-5.95, p = 0.006), and algae (at borderline significance; OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.96-3.618, p = 0.065). The density of larvae was reduced in sites that were larger than 100 m in perimeter (OR 0.151; 95% CI 0.060-0.381, p < 0.001), where water was tidal (OR 0.232; 95% CI 0.101-0.533, p = 0.001), vegetation shaded over 25% of the habitat (OR 0.352; 95% CI 0.136-0.911, p = 0.031) and water conductivity was above 2,000 muS/cm (OR 0.458; 95% CI 0.220-0.990, p = 0.048). Pools produced the highest numbers of Anopheles gambiae adults compared with rice fields, floodwater areas close to the edge of the floodplain or close to the river, and stream fringes. Pools were characterized by high water temperature and turbidity, low conductivity, increased presence of algae, and absence of tidal water.

Conclusion: There are few breeding sites that produce a high number of adult vectors in the middle reaches of the river in The Gambia, whereas those with low productivity are larger in area and can be found throughout the rainy season. Even though risk factors could be identified for the presence and density of larvae and productivity of habitats, the results indicate that anti-larval interventions in this area of The Gambia cannot be targeted in space or time during the rainy season.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Area samplers for sampling aquatic fauna.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Emergence traps used for estimating adult vector production per habitat type.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Weekly average density of mosquito larvae and predatory insects per m2 in relation to rainfall pattern.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average adult anopheline densities per week and m2 in different habitat types during the rainy season 2005. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Weekly emergence of chironomids and predatory insects per m2 in relation to rainfall pattern.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Weekly emergence of An. gambiae and An. coustani per m2 in relation to rainfall pattern.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Weekly emergence of culicine mosquitoes per m2 in relation to rainfall pattern.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Killeen GF, Fillinger U, Kiche I, Gouagna LC, Knols BG. Eradication of Anopheles gambiae from Brazil: lessons for malaria control in Africa? Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:618–627. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00397-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kitron U, Spielman A. Suppression of transmission of malaria through source reduction: antianopheline measures applied in Israel, the United States, and Italy. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11:391–406. - PubMed
    1. Russell PF. Man's mastery of malaria. London: Oxford University Press; 1955.
    1. Shousha AT, Pasha MD. The eradication of Anopheles gambiae from Upper Egypt. Bull World Health Organ. 1948;1:309–333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soper FL, Wilson DB. Anopheles gambiae in Brazil. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation; 1943.

Publication types

MeSH terms