Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers
- PMID: 19361737
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.037
Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers
Abstract
Introduction: The V-loop bonded lingual retainer is an innovative design that allows the patient to floss with ease, a significant advantage over the conventional straight wire design for interproximal plaque control. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of straight wire and V-loop fixed retainers with respect to detachment rate when used to stabilize maxillary or mandibular anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment.
Methods: Fixed, customized retainers were placed in 300 patients and followed for 6 months. The conventional retainer system was a .0175-in stainless steel multi-stranded wire placed as a straight, bonded lingual retainer. The newer system was a .016-in stainless steel black Australian wire placed in a V-loop design.
Results: The detachment rates were 14.3% for the V-loop design and 12.4% for the straight wire retainer. The difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The V-loop retainer system addresses cleanability and physiologic adaptability, both critical for the clinical success of bonded lingual retainers used for long-term retention. The interdental wire span of the V-loop design allows easier access for flossing and sufficient flexibility for independent tooth movement in the periodontal space. Patient acceptance of the V-loop bonded lingual retainer was excellent, and most patients in this study found the retainer comfortable and easy to floss.
Similar articles
-
Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):142-6. Aust Orthod J. 2009. PMID: 20043549 Clinical Trial.
-
Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study.Eur J Orthod. 2010 Dec;32(6):741-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq017. Epub 2010 Jun 13. Eur J Orthod. 2010. PMID: 20547494
-
Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.Quintessence Int. 2002 Sep;33(8):579-83. Quintessence Int. 2002. PMID: 12238688 Clinical Trial.
-
Orthodontic bonded retainers.J Ir Dent Assoc. 2005 Spring;51(1):29-32. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2005. PMID: 15789987 Review.
-
Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29602341 Review.
Cited by
-
Fixed Orthodontic Retainers: A Review.Turk J Orthod. 2019 Jun;32(2):110-114. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18080. Epub 2019 Jun 1. Turk J Orthod. 2019. PMID: 31294414 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? - systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.Head Face Med. 2021 Jul 24;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00281-3. Head Face Med. 2021. PMID: 34301280 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Invisalign® aligners in the treatment of severe gingival recession: A case report.Korean J Orthod. 2021 Jul 25;51(4):293-300. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.4.293. Korean J Orthod. 2021. PMID: 34275885 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Assessment of Three Mandibular Retention Protocols: A Prospective Cohort Study.Oral Health Prev Dent. 2022 Mar 14;20:77-84. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2805357. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2022. PMID: 35285595 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of the failure of fixed orthodontic bonded retainers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2023 Nov 30;45(6):645-661. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad047. Eur J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 37824794 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources