Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jun;36(6):459-67.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Apr 11.

Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial

Jessica T DeFrank et al. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Background: This study compares the efficacy of three types of reminders in promoting annual repeat mammography screening.

Design: RCT.

Setting and participants: Study recruitment occurred in 2004-2005. Participants were recruited through the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees. All were aged 40-75 years and had a screening mammogram prior to study enrollment. A total of 3547 women completed baseline telephone interviews.

Intervention: Prior to study recruitment, women were assigned randomly to one of three reminder groups: (1) printed enhanced usual care reminders (EUCRs); (2) automated telephone reminders (ATRs) identical in content to EUCRs; or (3) enhanced letter reminders that included additional information guided by behavioral theory. Interventions were delivered 2-3 months prior to women's mammography due dates.

Main outcome measures: Repeat mammography adherence, defined as having a mammogram no sooner than 10 months and no later than 14 months after the enrollment mammogram.

Results: Each intervention produced adherence proportions that ranged from 72% to 76%. Post-intervention adherence rates increased by an absolute 17.8% from baseline. Women assigned to ATRs were significantly more likely to have had mammograms than women assigned to EUCRs (p=0.014). Comparisons of reminder efficacy did not vary across key subgroups.

Conclusions: Although all reminders were effective in promoting repeat mammography adherence, ATRs were the most effective and lowest in cost. Health organizations should consider using ATRs to maximize proportions of members who receive mammograms at annual intervals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISM study design
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISM participant recruitment and randomization aRandom allocation to study arms occurred prior to participant contact and recruitment. Larger numbers for the ATR and ELR groups were planned for future analysis of supplemental intervention. bParticipants excluded from main analysis are: (1) those with self-reported race other than white or black (EUCR=7, ATR=24, ELR=22); (2) those who received subsequent mammograms ≤10 months after enrollment mammograms (EUCR=3, ATR=9, ELR=9), and/or those who received previous mammograms ≤10 months prior to enrollment mammograms (EUCR=38, ATR=63, ELR=45).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71–96. - PubMed
    1. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1784–92. - PubMed
    1. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5 Pt 1):347–60. - PubMed
    1. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet. 2003;361(9367):1405–10. - PubMed
    1. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(3):141–69. - PubMed

Publication types