Access to medications and medical care after participation in HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of trial protocols and informed consent documents
- PMID: 19362992
- PMCID: PMC2763544
- DOI: 10.1310/hct1001-13
Access to medications and medical care after participation in HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of trial protocols and informed consent documents
Abstract
Background: Expectations regarding receipt of medications and medical care after clinical trials conclude may inform decisions about trial participation. We describe the frequency with which these posttrial services are described in the protocols and informed consent forms (ICFs) of antiretroviral drug (ARV) trials.
Method: We systematically reviewed protocols and ICFs from Phase 3 and 4 antiretroviral trials in adults (> or = 12 years) from 1987 to 2006. Pharmaceutical industry-sponsored trials were selected from US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documentation and Clinicaltrials.gov. Trials administered by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) were selected from the ACTG online registry. ACTG- and industry-provided protocols and ICFs were reviewed in full. The primary outcome was any mention of posttrial services, defined as any text regarding posttrial medications or medical care.
Results: Complete trial documents were available for 31 (48%) of 65 trials meeting inclusion criteria. Documents from 14 trials (45%) mentioned any posttrial service: 12 (39%) mentioned medications, and 5 (16%) mentioned medical care. Payment for trial participation (74%) and for care for trial-related injury (94%) were mentioned more often than were posttrial services.
Conclusions: Posttrial medications or medical care was mentioned in the trial documents of <50% of reviewed antiretroviral trials. Improved efforts are needed to clearly describe posttrial services in clinical trial protocols and ICFs.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: Paul E. Sax reports serving as a consultant for Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Glaxo-SmithKline, Merck, and Tibotec; receiving teaching honoraria from Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Merck, and Tibotec; and receiving grant support from Tibotec and Merck. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Pace C, Grady C, Wendler D, Bebchuk JD, Tavel JA, McNay LA, et al. Post-trial access to tested interventions: The views of IRB/REC chair, investigators, and research participants in a multinational HIV/AIDS study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2006;22:837–841. - PubMed
-
- Moral standards for research in developing countries: From “reasonable availability” to “fair benefi ts.”. Hastings Center Report; Participants in the 2001 Conference on Ethical Aspects of Research in Developing Countries.2004. pp. 17–27. - PubMed
-
- Emanuel EJ. Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts? Am J Bioethics. 2005;5:9–13. - PubMed
-
- GlaxoSmithKline. Clinical trials in the developing world. 2005. [Accessed December 15, 2005]. Available at: http://www.gsk.com/corporate_responsibility/Downloads/clinical_trials_in....
-
- Macklin R. After Helsinki: Unresolved issues in international research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001;11:17–36. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R37 AI042006/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AI 60354/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R37 AI 42006/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- T32 AI 07433/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AI 058736/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AI058736/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- T32 AI007433/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NR009289/NR/NINR NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AI068636/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AI 068636/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AI060354/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NR 009289-01/NR/NINR NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical