Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD156 Task Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative Materials
- PMID: 1936644
- DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(91)90049-5
Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD156 Task Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative Materials
Abstract
Before a standard designed to test the adhesion of adhesive restorative materials can be accepted, it is necessary to identify those parameters which are of clinical relevance and which can be studied under in vitro testing conditions. The goal of this report has been to identify information related to how dentinal fluid, intra-tubular pressure, polymerization shrinkage, cavity preparation, cavity shape, placement technique, curing method, tooth age, environmental conditions, masticatory forces, thermal cycling, and microleakage influence the bond strength++ of adhesive restorative materials. This review is also intended to function both as an information base of past experimental data as well as a source of guidance for further, needed research.
Similar articles
-
Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 May-Aug;75(2):125-33. J Dent Child (Chic). 2008. PMID: 18647507
-
Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):512-9. Oper Dent. 2000. PMID: 11203864
-
Microleakage and microtensile bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based restorative systems.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;34 Spec No 8:19-24. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013. PMID: 24568172
-
An Overview of Dental Adhesive Systems and the Dynamic Tooth-Adhesive Interface.Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;61(4):713-731. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.001. Dent Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28886765 Review.
-
Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. A review in 3 parts. Part 3: in vitro tests of adhesive systems.Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2011;121(11):1024-40. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2011. PMID: 22139713 Review. English, German.
Cited by
-
Influence of application parameters on bond strength of an "all in one" water-based self-etching primer/adhesive after 6 and 12 months of water aging.Odontology. 2010 Jul;98(2):117-25. doi: 10.1007/s10266-010-0126-3. Epub 2010 Jul 23. Odontology. 2010. PMID: 20652789
-
Factors affecting the bond strength of self-etch adhesives: A meta-analysis of literature.J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jan;14(1):62-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.80746. J Conserv Dent. 2011. PMID: 21691509 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of ethanol concentrations of acrylate-based dental adhesives on microtensile composite-dentin bond strength and hybrid layer structure of a 10 wt% polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-incorporated bonding agent.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Jan-Feb;15(1):25-32. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.223615. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018. PMID: 29497444 Free PMC article.
-
Inhibition of cell survival, viability and proliferation by dentin adhesives after direct and indirect exposure in vitro.Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Dec;16(6):1635-46. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0669-x. Epub 2012 Jan 6. Clin Oral Investig. 2012. PMID: 22222515
-
An In Vitro Comparison of the Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial and Deep Dentin, Treated With Er:YAG Laser Irradiation or Acid-Etching.J Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Summer;7(3):167-171. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.29. Epub 2016 Jul 18. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 28144437 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous